brians1128
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2016
- 647
- 320
Let's hope they're both still available. Would be an organizational home run.
delete post
Let's hope they're both still available. Would be an organizational home run.
Note: If I haven’t seen a player at least four times, they don’t get evaluated. That’s why highly rated players like German winger Dominik Bokk and Russian forward Vitaly Kravtsov aren’t in this month’s rankings.Ok so Bokk and Kravstov fall out of the top 90 sign me up
Ive been praying for all 3 but I'm starting to lose hope, maybe too much tunnel vision
goaltending is killing Chicago, Oilers aren't good outside of their 2 big names, islanders are horrible the next 8 years will be the same as the last 8 with Barzal replacing JT
Ok so Bokk and Kravstov fall out of the top 90 sign me up
I want one of the RHDs with top pairing upside with the 1st pick, then I want to high end wings. I’ll take both Kravtsov and Bokk with the late 1sts.
The Rangers are about to finish with the toughest part of their schedule. They’ve only beaten one team in a playoff spot.
Note: If I haven’t seen a player at least four times, they don’t get evaluated. That’s why highly rated players like German winger Dominik Bokk and Russian forward Vitaly Kravtsov aren’t in this month’s rankings.
Guess ya missed this
Let's hope they're both still available. Would be an organizational home run.
Button ALWAYS has some wack ass lists.Tkachuk at 2 and Hayton at 7 is ridiculous, but i also think it's equally ridiculous to have Ginning at 38, he's not very good at all. Lundkvist outside of the top 90 is something else too.
Button ALWAYS has some wack ass lists.
No way am I taking Samuelsson with our first round pick, that has Dylan McIlrath written all over it. Can we go for a guy with a high ceiling please?
Dylan McIlrath had a high ceiling too.
Samuelsson, like McIlrath, is the definition of a swing for the fences pick. I'd have no problem taking him if the Rangers took another "safer" player like Bouchard or Smith earlier on.
I have a good feeling one of Kravtsov or Bokk will be there at 24,25ish. Hell Tolvanen made it to 3o and Kostin to 31 and I would have taken them top 10 and top 20-25 respectivelyWould rather swing on Merkley...
No way am I taking Samuelsson with our first round pick, that has Dylan McIlrath written all over it. Can we go for a guy with a high ceiling please?
I have a good feeling one of Kravtsov or Bokk will be there at 24,25ish. Hell Tolvanen made it to 3o and Kostin to 31 and I would have taken them top 10 and top 20-25 respectively
How do you feel about Denisenko if his stock is a dropping a bit. could it drop to the late first?
I honestly don't think Kravtsov will be there with one of NYR's late firsts. He's playing some great playoff hockey, rn. Bokk could be, though. Both would be great adds to the organization.
Think most thought Denisenko would be in Lokomotiv this year, but he's developing still in the MHL. He's got very good balance and skating ability. I actually think he could develop a second gear to his speed. Very good playmaker, but most thought he took a step back. I still think he's a 1st round talent and would definitely take him with one of NYR's later firsts.
Are you talking about Mattias or Adam? I like Mattias more than AdamIn what way does he have Dylan McIlrath written all over him? Because of his size?
Skating? Shooting? Creativity with the puck or lack thereof?In what way does he have Dylan McIlrath written all over him? Because of his size?
Are you talking about Mattias or Adam? I like Mattias more than Adam
Skating? Shooting? Creativity with the puck or lack thereof?
Sending in the good vibes:
I have no clue where you've gotten this opinion from.
He's a good skater, not just for his size, an actual good skater. He has a good shot, as well.
He's not exceptionally creative, but neither is Vlasic or Ekholm, McDonagh isn't the most creative.
Not every defensemen who doesn't walk a whole defense in juniors is a plug.