No angle? Really? The first angle that CBC showed, you can literally see Carriers shoulder move as Doughty makes contact with it
Looks to me like Doughty's arm slips by and Carrier is trying not to get hit there. I'll concede that maybe that first angle can possibly indicate that, but like I said, to me it looks like any contact to the shoulder is completely incidental to the full brunt of the force which was to the head.
Let's just say there was that contact to the shoulder. It really shouldn't matter. Players shouldn't throw blindside high hits. Period. I don't care how mad he was at Carrier. These kinds of hits are pretty much a 50/50 chance (conservative estimate honestly) of resulting in significant force to the head. Something the NHL is really lagging behind in limiting. The Paul Kariya's of this world exist and suffer because we care far too much about lack of intent to injure and incidental first touchings. I don't think Doughty was necessarily trying to hit the head but if he was going pure shoulder for shoulder, he missed.
I mean. I know I have a biased perspective but I argued for Patrick Maroon's suspension when he hit Doughty in the head. Obviously that was more malicious and reckless, but here we are. I want reckless
and malicious plays alike to be handled with the same kind of deferrence to continuing player safety, but the NHL is way too slow to adapt. I don't want a no hitting league, but I mean...there were a good 100 hits last night thrown that weren't reckless or dangerous. We need to limit, as far as possible, the one kind of hit we saw last night that took Will Carrier out of the game.
EDIT: Until the NHL shows it has the balls to discipline a guy like Doughty for reckless/carelessness, players are going to keep doing shit like this.