Do you think the NHLPA will accept the NHL's offer?

Discussion in 'The Business of Hockey' started by Koivu11, Feb 15, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Koivu11

    Koivu11 Fire Bergevin

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    828
    Trophy Points:
    119
    What do you think?
     
  2. Rhett4

    Rhett4 Buffalo Selects Jack

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    13,125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Amerks #ROC
    Does this offer have any revenue sharing? If so, then they might consider it. If not, then they walk away.

    I think the league is being selfish by not including revenue sharing. Everyone blames the players for being greedy, but Bettman and his cronies are just as bad.
     
  3. kremlin

    kremlin Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Of course not, they rather accept a worse deal somewhere January 2006.
     
  4. SPARTAKUS*

    SPARTAKUS* Guest

    Do you know for a fact that the NHL as not include any revenue sharing?
    I think the players will accept this offer. Why? Because it's the best offer they will ever get period.
     
  5. BLONG7

    BLONG7 Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2002
    Messages:
    20,242
    Likes Received:
    2,023
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    Nova Scotia
    Home Page:
    Bettman will and is looking bad with his 42.5M take it or leave it, I thought he would be around 45-46M...that doesn't mean everyone is going to spend it up to that level, my pro owners slant is switching to the players for finally conceeding a cap...Come on Gary work with them here...
     
  6. Rhett4

    Rhett4 Buffalo Selects Jack

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    13,125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Amerks #ROC
    I have no idea if they have revenue sharing or not. That's why I asked. I know they were against it earlier, however.
     
  7. sandman441

    sandman441 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    6,943
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    ALASKA


    Yeah I am on the owners side but that is a little low. Hopefully the owners will accept something around 46 give or take a million.
     
  8. SPARTAKUS*

    SPARTAKUS* Guest

    Are you telling me that the players will refuse this offer for a 2.5 million gap?
     
  9. Spooner

    Spooner Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2004
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Oh, here and there
    I voted yes, but I'm an optimist. I think the minute they agreed to a salary cap it was just a matter of time before they got the numbers down. They broke down the first wall, I don't think either side is going to let a few million get in the way of a season.
     
  10. SPARTAKUS*

    SPARTAKUS* Guest

    I heard on TSN that the NHL as assure the union that they will be enough revenue sharing to ensure that all the clubs will met the $32 millions floor
     
  11. kremlin

    kremlin Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    44.7 million (that includes bonuses), you call that low for 20 roster players? You must be kidding me....
     
  12. Rhett4

    Rhett4 Buffalo Selects Jack

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    13,125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Amerks #ROC
    That I like. If they can make sure no team loses money at 32 million, then that's a good deal. With some good management, teams can go higher and make profits.
     
  13. Scoogs

    Scoogs Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Messages:
    18,309
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    I put yes, but only because it will essentially be the same offer... the cap will likely be bumped up a tad.
     
  14. Cropduster

    Cropduster Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    California
    do you think the NHLPA will reject this right away to make the NHL think about their hard stance longer? Seems like the longer it takes for the NHLPA to respond the more likely the NHLPA will accept it
     
  15. ChiHawks468

    ChiHawks468 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Sales
    Location:
    Aurora, IL
    I put no for the simple reason that Bettman made the letter public. Proposals I can see making public, but not an ultimatium letter. It is not "good faith" negotiating IMO. I think we will hear them reject it very soon. :help:
     
  16. Biggest Canuck Fan

    Biggest Canuck Fan BCF

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    10,922
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Document solutions expert
    Location:
    Abbotsford, BC
    Home Page:
    I would love for the PA to say yes, but Bettman has put a gun to their head. I don't like it, and I don't think the PA does at all.

    Having said this I didn't imagine the PA and the league would be this close to a deal... these sides are extremely close. If the PA wants more, just ask for a re-open clause and watch the $$$.

    Take it this time so you can give it next time.
     
  17. VernonForrest

    VernonForrest Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    Plymouth
    Home Page:

    Why should their be revenue sharing? This isnt some communist league where if your business fails because you made a dumb decision by bringing it to a market such as carolina, you should be benefited. People who have made smart business decisions like bringing their expansion franchise to St. Paul, running their operation efficiently should not be penalized and should get to keep their profits.
     
  18. RangerBoy

    RangerBoy TRUST THE PROCESS

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2002
    Messages:
    38,539
    Likes Received:
    2,080
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    New York
    Home Page:
    The NHLPA will reject the NHL offer but a counteroffer will be made.The NHLPA wants the hard cap at $46-47 million.They met at $45 million :handclap:
     
  19. kerrly

    kerrly Registered User

    Joined:
    May 16, 2004
    Messages:
    809
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    64
    Location:
    Regina
    According to Goodenow and Saskin's previous statements about not negotiating on offers states otherwise. Basically, they said they did not negotiate because they assumed that the triggers were not negotiable. And in this letter it clearly states its the final offer and there is no room for negotiation.

    Of course none of this matters, because its crunch time, but I thought I had to take another shot at the PA just for fun.
     
  20. tripledekehockey

    tripledekehockey Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    pittsburgh pa
    no, put the cap at 45-46 mill
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"