There are two completely different players. Provorov controls the game for us. He played almost 28 minutes against Malkin in game 2. I don't know what you mean by Werensky >>>>>>> Provorov, and it's ok to have personal preference. But yeah, I think you may be alone in your math.
1. Ok, that’s fair
Burns has thrown away games for the Sharks at times. Do you think he’s a bottom pairing?
Did you watch the goal? Greene was just getting on the ice. At the point Severson should have played the man on the right wing. Greene was pointing becasue hockey 101 says that Severson should've taken the man, but it was too late for him at that point. Blame Greene for slowing down for sure and there must've been miscommunication but he slowed down becasue Severson had a brainfart and let the man walk in instead of taking him. . WHy have the guy get on the ice and skate across the width of the ice to get the far man when Severson was closer? That is taught in pee wee, which i presume you never made it too.
here is the still. Look at where Greene is. The puck is in motion and about to cross the blueline. He takes the man with the puck. Severson is like duh. That was in severson for not paying attention and taking the far guy. Should've been on palmeiri as well for not taking point. Didn't even look over his shoulder. How you think that is in Greene is beyond me. The only thing Greene did wrong was telling severson that it was his man(which it was) instead of trying to stupidly cheese him down.
As Greene is hopping onto the ice, he immediately sprints over to cover Point, which was good. Severson was keeping his distance from Point, and as he was about to engage, he sees Greene come over and run to cover Point. In Severson's mind, he is thinking that Greene is coming up to take Point and try to intercept the pass that went to Point, so he dropped back and covered in case there was another pass coming across into the middle. Now, it appears that Greene is covering Point. He makes it seem that he is covering Point in the way that he sprints over to cover him. Now, he points at Point to Severson, and appears to tell him to cover him, even though everything Greene has done has made it appear that he is covering Point on that play. As he is doing this, Point bolts passed Greene and to the net. Had Greene not stopped playing mid game to tell Severson to cover a man that he was covering, Greene could have been able to get over to Point and either strip the puck from him or deflect the shot, or even force a pass so that Tampa is forced to set up in the zone. But because Greene forgot to cover Point, even though everything he did indicated that he was the one covering him, the Bolts scored
lol. You ever play hockey? You have no idea how to analyze a game. This is clearly on severson and Palmeiri for not playing Point while Greene took the guy on his side, which was what he did. Like I said. You learn that in pee wee. Blame Greene all you want for pointing(pointing because he knew it wasn't his man) or for slowing down when he expected severson to take point. Fact is. Severson screwed up and because he did it messed up Greene when he realized severson was an idiot. You team gets caught on a line change. Your D stay the opposite side of the bench, so the d coming on doesn't have to skate all the way across cuz he has no time Not just hockey 101, its hockey common sense.
Why would a team in the playoffs today move one of their best dmen for a lesser player?
Okay fine
