InjuredChoker
Registered User
pronmans top 50 prospect list (less than 50 NHL games total/25 in a single season) didn't have any red wings on it. rasmussen was HM, with about 20 other players.
it's on theathletic.
it's on theathletic.
pronmans top 50 prospect list (less than 50 NHL games total/25 in a single season) didn't have any red wings on it. rasmussen was HM, with about 20 other players.
it's on theathletic.
It's bizarre to me that this guy is paid for his opinions. He has a Pronman model hockey player he likes and if you fit the mold, he overrates you.
But there hasn't been much evidence, so far, that there's any thing to his mold.
I don't think he's the best out there, but I don't really get the hate. Two guys he was higher on that hit than most off the top of my head would be Kucherov and Arvidsson.
He also explains his rankings pretty well and is open to answering questions. I only really pay attention to hockeyprospect.com, McKenzie, Button, and Pronman... personally. Future Considerations is decent.
I don't hate. He's just definitely got a mold that he uses and I'm not sure it's based on anything other than personal preference.
I don't disagree that he has a type. He really probably overvalues skill (or perceived skill), sometimes at the expense of size and/or skating. But with the way the league is going, prioritizing skill over everything else doesn't seem like the worse methodology in the world, in my opinion.
My bigger issue with him is when he ranks drafted prospects, he holds on too tightly to where he had guys with his pre-draft rankings.
I don't hate Pronman, but I have an issue with this in regards to him.My bigger issue with him is when he ranks drafted prospects, he holds on too tightly to where he had guys with his pre-draft rankings.
Rasmussen, who had surgery before Christmas, has been skating, but has not been a full participant in practice. He still is about two weeks away from playing, but Williamson said it’s good to have him back with the team.
“He’s your captain, and obviously you would like him in your lineup, but if he’s not in the lineup, to be around and in the dressing room,” Williamson said. “He’s a competitive guy, whether he’s on the ice or in the stands, he’s got his game face on. This has been tough on him. At the same time, it’s great to have him back around. He’s not too far off. We have to get by without some guys for a few more weeks, but we know they will be back and we will have to have a big push the last couple of months of the year.”
I wonder if Jeremy Bracco would be top 5 in our prospect ranking. Anyone willing to trade Rasmussen straight up for Kapanen?pronmans top 50 prospect list (less than 50 NHL games total/25 in a single season) didn't have any red wings on it. rasmussen was HM, with about 20 other players.
it's on theathletic.
Every "public" scout gets hate for their lists, and even more so if you dare trust your instincts instead of following the common opinion. It's always the same thing when people judge these scouts - point out the few steals they (and 99% of other scouts) missed and if they got one right it was because everyone else was stupid not to recognize that kid.
By the way, how the heck do you rank players if not by personal preference???
You could rank by eye color. Maybe the area of the glabella. Or perhaps who started shaving first. Just to name a few.
pronmans top 50 prospect list (less than 50 NHL games total/25 in a single season) didn't have any red wings on it. rasmussen was HM, with about 20 other players.
it's on theathletic.
I think him and Button are interesting to look at, but like most scouts they have huge success and failures on the list.
Cholowski with 2 assists last night and 3rd star of the game
HIGHLIGHTS – Hawks Late Marker Not Enough Against Broncos – Jan. 19th, 2018 – Portland Winterhawks
Cholowski with a secondary assist tonight
I don't disagree that he has a type. He really probably overvalues skill (or perceived skill), sometimes at the expense of size and/or skating. But with the way the league is going, prioritizing skill over everything else doesn't seem like the worse methodology in the world, in my opinion.
My bigger issue with him is when he ranks drafted prospects, he holds on too tightly to where he had guys with his pre-draft rankings.