Speaking Moistly
What a terrible image.
Whats his waiver status for next season?
He’s no longer waiver exempt.
Whats his waiver status for next season?
Wild fan here,
May I ask for a summary of how Daniel Sprong is progressing? I hear that he has extremely high upside as a RW but, he's 21 and still in the QMJHL. Is there a reason for this?
What would his value be in a trade?
Rutherford first said he should be a regular, and then went back and said he will be a regular. I think this makes it pretty likely he won't be traded this off-season.
Trade wise, most of us would prefer not to lose him, but would consider it for an improvement on defence. One on one, we'd want a young NHL ready dman with top 4 potential - Rasmus Andersson from Calgary is the example commonly used, assuming Calgary fans are telling us the truth about him. If we were to use him in a package with other assets, it would be a package aimed at bringing back a 2-3 dman.
Rutherford first said he should be a regular, and then went back and said he will be a regular. I think this makes it pretty likely he won't be traded this off-season.
I want Sprong to play, I think almost as much as @Kip Drordy but I wonder if this isn't an attempt to build value.
This makes me happy if true. Really pulling for the kid to make it.GMs don't actually do this, I feel like this is just a myth. He was asked about Sprong and Rutherford said that he'll be a regular on the team next year, which is what everyone expected. I don't think it's anything more than that.
“He should be a regular on our team,” Rutherford said of Sprong. “We were very careful this year with him, as you know. We develop players in different ways."
“Certainly he had the ability at certain times to come in and play an offensive role on our team. He needed to work on his all-around game. He did that. There were times in Wilkes-Barre when it dropped off a little bit, but I think it was more from disappointment he wasn’t called up here.
“He’s a very talented player that will score a lot of goals in this league. He will be a regular on our team next year.”
This was Rutherford's full quote on Sprong.
I want Sprong to play, I ink almost as much as @Kip Drordy but I wonder if this isn't an attempt to build value.
There is one reason Bennett wasn't and won't be an NHL player; injuries. Even if he never turned out to be the scoring line winger we wanted when we drafted him, he was still good enough to be a serviceable player in the bottom six. Injuries really decimated his career.I understand why Rutherford leaves players to do well in all areas before calling them up. He stated long ago that he wished he kept Bennett in the minors longer and they didn't develop him correctly. Bennett had the skill and IQ to be a good NHL player but now isn't even in the NHL.
This was Rutherford's full quote on Sprong.
One has to wonder how a GM can be so sure that a prospect will make the team next year when his coach decided he shouldn't play in the playoffs at all this year. We could ice the exact same forward roster next year, if we chose.
Did Sprong just immediately get better as soon as the playoffs ended?
Is Sully getting a toy taken away?
Did Sully and JR decide to give the whole returning group enough rope for this year, but the disappointing performance from some of the supporting cast coupled with the loss was the red line?