Crosby leapfrogs Lemieux in all-time playoff points

PenguinSpeed

Registered User
Oct 4, 2017
1,799
898
You also need to realize that nobody will ever dominate their peers the way players of the past did, its just not possible with the tightening of the skill level gap from the best to the worst in the league. However, what this thread and many Crosby threads attempt to point out, is that he is making a case for being ranked up there with the all time greats and him surpassing Lemieux and many other greats in playoff points is just another reason why he may be considered one of the greatest to ever play the game.

-He already is. Mike Biggest Penguin Hater of All Time Milbury said live in last nights game Crosby is without question a Top 5 player All Time right now if he retired today. Ive got him top 3 with Wayne and Mario.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bar Down

harmonica

Registered User
Apr 21, 2007
2,953
1,417
-He already is. Mike Biggest Penguin Hater of All Time Milbury said live in last nights game Crosby is without question a Top 5 player All Time right now if he retired today. Ive got him top 3 with Wayne and Mario.

100% agreement from a personal standpoint. I am more referencing a consensus that he is a top tiered player of all time. I don't think we are anywhere close to that, especially on these forums. However, when all is said and done, there is no doubt in my mind that he will be.
 

PenguinSpeed

Registered User
Oct 4, 2017
1,799
898
How are they better if they don't have a single Vezina to their name?

-I dont care about regular season stats. And every Vezina winner came out of the East in the last 10 years. And most of them lost to the Penguins. Tom Barraso has a Vezina. He's also a hall of famer. And no sane Penguin fan would take Barraso over Murray or Fleury
 

harmonica

Registered User
Apr 21, 2007
2,953
1,417
They didn't just dominate the average League player. They dominated other stars, beating them by 20+% in scoring. Crosby beats his 2nd by 5% in scoring and not nearly as often the other Big Three forwards did. You don't need to dominate the entire League, top to bottom. You should just beat the second best player, hopefully by a significant margin. In Art Rosses and Harts Crosby is not in the same stratosphere.

The thing is, nobody dominates like that anymore and all indicators are that nobody ever will again. But that doesn't take away from how skilled high end players are today, it just points to how the game has evolved and that there is more parity among players. Nobody will ever score like Wayne or Mario ever again, but they don't necessarily need to in order to be considered one of the greatest ever.
 

harmonica

Registered User
Apr 21, 2007
2,953
1,417
Would that be before or after he knocked Crosby out with a single blow to the head? After all, Sid was made of glass his first few years in the league.

Your stance is kindergarten lite.

Sid's injury problems didn't start occurring until his 6th season and they haven't been an issue for the past five. You clearly seem to have this fantasy bias view of him.
 

Sentinel

Registered User
May 26, 2009
12,847
4,686
New Jersey
www.vvinenglish.com
-I dont care about regular season stats. And every Vezina winner came out of the East in the last 10 years. And most of them lost to the Penguins. Tom Barraso has a Vezina. He's also a hall of famer. And no sane Penguin fan would take Barraso over Murray or Fleury
So if you don't care about regular season stats, (1) doesnt mean players' value is not determined by them to a large degree and (2) you better not list Crosby anywhere near the Top 10, because even with his both (weak) Conn Smythes, he did not even lead his team in points in each of the three Cup runs.
 

PenguinSpeed

Registered User
Oct 4, 2017
1,799
898
The thing is, nobody dominates like that anymore and all indicators are that nobody ever will again. But that doesn't take away from how skilled high end players are today, it just points to how the game has evolved and that there is more parity among players. Nobody will ever score like Wayne or Mario ever again, but they don't necessarily need to in order to be considered one of the greatest ever.


-Era Adjusted Stats. Best metric ever invented. If the rules change in 5 years, 10 years, 50 years, Ill always go back to this. I wonder how many people that post on this forum know the rink sizes were not even the same size in the olden days. The game today in comparison to the 50's or the 80's is like comparing the 1500's without planes, cars, and phones to today. Its not even the same game. Thats why I always said anything before 1990 and worldwide expansion of players is the old age Canadian NHL. Post 1990 is New Age.




hockey-adjusted-points-per-game-april-2017.png
 

Son Goku

henlo u stinky egg
Mar 8, 2014
11,887
2,177
The World Of Void
Very sure. A string of first-ballot HOF defensemen, and four goalies routinely named in the Top 15 of all time? Today's top goalies can't even win the Cup without an all-star cast.
Patrick Roy, and Brodeur didn't have great teams? Lidstrom? Chelios? Niedermayer? Pronger? All had great teams.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,947
5,826
Visit site
You don't know who Gordie Howe really is, do you? You can start by reading Wikipedia. The first (or second, I forgot) line says "widely considered to be the most complete player to ever play NHL." That includes two-way play, which in the 06 era was THE way to play hockey. And Howe was the best.

It's like arguing with children. Have you all began watching hockey when Crosby entered the league?

Sounds like someone is a bit insecure here.

It's great that Howe has a good defensive rep among his peers like Wayne and Mario and other forwards in the Top Ten but "2-way" and "complete" are subjective terms and this hardly means that his defensive game is Top Ten all-time like his offensive game is.

Crosby is very good defensively, and has played more of a 2-way role than an offensive one for awhile now. He certainly can be considered the most complete player among the top 5 offensive forwards in the league.

As far as I am concerned, their offensive #'s should be the primary metric to compare.

To clarify, I said Crosby is starting to put together a resume that could put him closer to the Big 4 than any other player. Him staying in the conversation for best player is an absolute must in order to do so and/or a playoff resume that is closer to Wayne's than any other player. Both of these things are not off the table for Crosby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: canadianguy77

FinProspects

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
1,662
222
I think that:

- In order for Sid to lock the #5 all time requires:
One dominant reg season still, i.e. at least one major award Hart/Art/Lindsay
PPG until he is 35ish, and then consistent seasons until he finishes.
1-2 cup runs, but that is not a necessity, as he qualifies as one of the best playoff performers ever with 4 Smyther worthy runs, 4 finals, 2 Smythes+3cups and will take a top5 place in all time playoff scoring eventually.

Thats basically it.

- In order for Sid to have a chance to beat Howe, Orr or Mario:
2-3 dominant reg seasons, Hart+Art+Lindsay combo.
PPG until he retires, and needs to play until he is 40ish.
Playoffs, see above.

He is not beating Wayne in any scenario.
 

madinsomniac

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
12,854
3,022
Pittsburgh, Pa
Orr is absolutely worthy of being rated above Crosby. There is no question Mario, Gretzky and Orr are the three best of all time.

Im a fan of Howe. I think he is on par with those three... I also understand all the arguments against him being in that tier but being the best of the second tier... I lean more to him being the clear #4 of all time with a dropoff to the next level...

Crosby is the best of his era... he is definitely below the big 3 maybe on par with Howe... he is better than the second tier super super stars like Jagr and Yzerman though

It doesn't help Crosby that the most physically talented player in Crosby's prime played on the team with him, and the chief rival for dominance in this era was a winger who played on a team that chronically choked in the playoffs...
 

Tuna Tatarrrrrr

Here Is The Legendary Rat Of HFBoards! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Jun 13, 2012
1,978
1,987
is his name still on the cup?

i notice red wing fans especially hate seeing any praise for crosby, all their success and they still hurt from 2009
Of course it is, the last time he won the cup was with the Devils in 2000.

Edit: I don't care about the Dead Things fans at all but if they still really are, it's just funny to me.
 
Last edited:

Nadal On Clay

Djokovic > Nadal > Federer
Oct 11, 2017
3,080
2,718
So if you don't care about regular season stats, (1) doesnt mean players' value is not determined by them to a large degree and (2) you better not list Crosby anywhere near the Top 10, because even with his both (weak) Conn Smythes, he did not even lead his team in points in each of the three Cup runs.

I’d like to know why do you consider Sid’s last Conn-Smythe as weak?
 

UnderratedBrooks44

Registered User
Sep 13, 2005
17,564
315
Miranda's house
-He already is. Mike Biggest Penguin Hater of All Time Milbury said live in last nights game Crosby is without question a Top 5 player All Time right now if he retired today. Ive got him top 3 with Wayne and Mario.

Love Sid here, but you're living too much in the moment off of a record it took him about 45 games longer than Lemieux to accomplish. Sid is great. I think he's the greatest player of the last 20 years at worst, and somewhere among the best players of all time. That's nothing to sneeze at. However, to get any more specific than that is incredibly difficult, especially if you're arguing with someone (not me) who saw Bobby Orr, etc. play.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad