Value of: Corey Perry at $5 Million
- Thread starter McDonald19
- Start date
So we go from a bad contract to worse and get a less productive player.
oconnor9sean
Registered User
I wouldn’t mind putting him on Benn and Seguin’s RW. Let’s us move Radulov down to the 2nd line.
I’m way off with knowing value though, so I won’t speculate.
I’m way off with knowing value though, so I won’t speculate.
thewookie1
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2015
- 1,377
- 1,086
Corey Perry with 1.625 mil retained (7 mil cap hit for 3 years) for Matt Moulson with 50% retained (2.5mil for 1 year) and the rights to Hudson Fasching
I can't help thinking that while the Ducks will explore all options, most likely Perry is with the ducks for another year. I think Perry is much more trade-able (and any retention easier to accept) with only two years left on his contract. Also, while I have no idea how to do the math, my guess is the buyout becomes more attractive. The ducks are better off overpaying him for one more year - it is not like his production has fallen off. I would also point out that part of the reason for the drop off in scoring is he no longer gets first team power play minutes.
Also, after next year, the Ducks can approach Perry and let him know that he's not going to be protected in the expansion draft (i.e., either he waives NMC or is bought out). My guess is that makes him more amenable to being traded.
Also, after next year, the Ducks can approach Perry and let him know that he's not going to be protected in the expansion draft (i.e., either he waives NMC or is bought out). My guess is that makes him more amenable to being traded.
MMC
Global Moderator
mightyquack
eggplant and jade or bust
- Apr 28, 2010
- 26,395
- 5,125
If Anaheim is purely looking to dump Perry, then this would be a no brainer for Anaheim I would think.
thewookie1
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2015
- 1,377
- 1,086
McDonald19
Registered User
I like it as a pure cap dump, but also think the Ducks can get a real asset or two if they retain more salary.
nilssont
Registered User
- May 27, 2007
- 1,766
- 275
KaseMeOutside
Based
- Oct 18, 2011
- 44,088
- 9,711
McDonald19
Registered User
I guess barely, he is useful as something of a playmaker now since he can't hit 20 goals anymore.
Man Bear Pig
Registered User
He'd be a waste of cap space for us. Take your chances with better, younger and cheaper players like Johnsson and Kapanen.
Except some NHL teams executives, but what do they know, right? It was reported by Friedman(?) that there is interest, because he obviously is struggling. However, I say there is 1% chance he is moved, as his huge contract and NMC makes it very very difficult. While teams are at least somewhat interested, they will not break the bank for him anymore.
Pretty damning comments by Murray when he makes comments about Perry’s off season commitment.
Perry only leaves if he wants to.
McDonald19
Registered User
SotasicA
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2014
- 8,489
- 6,404
Yes. They have about $7.5m and that's with Hossa who could be LTIR'd. Hawks could even fit Tavares no problem.
Johnny Hoxville
The Return of a Legend
Cancuks
Former Exalted Ruler
Unless one side exercises the opt out clause in the cba in 2019 making th cba expire in sept 2020. Nhl would hen push the ED to 2021 which is the year Perry’s contract expires.
Laughable to try and suggest that Lucic and Perry have equal value. I hate both but Perry at 49 points in 71 games with another three years at 8.625 million is significantly more valuable than Lucic at 34 points in 82 games at 6 million for another 5 years. That's not even close and I'm insulted for Ducks fans whose team I don't like that anyone thought they were even close to equal. If the Oilers wanted to swap Lucic for Perry, they're adding a 1st round draft pick and I still wouldn't do that if I ran the Ducks.
dracom
Registered User
Crow
Registered User
- May 19, 2014
- 3,905
- 2,825
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
Pre-Game Talk: WCQF | Vancouver Canucks vs. Nashville Predators- Latest: StickShift
