Value of: Corey Perry at $5 Million

McDonald19

Registered User
Sep 9, 2003
22,982
3,849
California
The Ducks need to do something significant to shake up the team chemistry after this season. Of the Big three 30+ year old core players, Perry makes the most sense to move.

Hypothetically:

Corey Perry waives his no move clause and the Ducks are willing to retain $3.625 per.

18-19: $5 Million
19-20: $5 Million
20-21: $5 Million

You get a slow gritty soon to be 33 year old 50 point former Hart trophy winner on contract for three seasons at a $5 million cap hit.

Offers?
 

lwvs84

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
4,098
2,796
Los Angeles, CA
That’s quite the sales pitch get an old, slow, shell of his former self.

To be fair, "shell of his former self" is a relative term... he did have an MVP season and put up a few 40+ goal years. He's not that anymore, but he's still a solid NHL player... just not for 8.5+ mil per year. He still shows flashes, his minutes just need to be handled a bit better and he's probably better on a second line role than a top line. He's not washed up, but not what he used to be either.
 

Frankie Blueberries

Allergic to draft picks
Jan 27, 2016
9,150
10,631
The comments in this thread have been largely too harsh. Perry would still have value at 5 million. He's a consistent 50-60 point player, that's an above-average second liner. He also steps it up in the playoffs, as he's put up respectable numbers in every playoff series outside of this year.

I'd say he's worth at least a late 1st, maybe more.
 

Mallard

Registered User
Apr 19, 2017
1,752
429
Canada
If his contract now was $5M Ducks wouldn't even think of trading him. He's just not worth over $8M anymore hence Ducks retaining on a trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MonahanFan

Spazkat

Registered User
Feb 19, 2015
4,361
2,277
If his contract now was $5M Ducks wouldn't even think of trading him. He's just not worth over $8M anymore hence Ducks retaining on a trade.

To be fair I highly doubt the Ducks are thinking of trading him at all let alone retaining 3.65M to do so. I think thats almost entirely wishful thinking on the part of a lot of fans
 

Wingsfan 4 life

Registered User
Oct 9, 2016
1,711
429
I think it'd have to be $5.125M, not an even $5M. Total salary in Perry's last year is $7M. Retention cannot exceed 50% for both salary and cap hit.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,007
9,638
To be fair I highly doubt the Ducks are thinking of trading him at all let alone retaining 3.65M to do so. I think thats almost entirely wishful thinking on the part of a lot of fans
He and Getz are the core guys of the ducks. Next longest serving member is Fowler then cogs.

D core is young. Between 21-26 with KB and FB done.

Major shakeup would have to be upfront. Don’t think they have centred coming up to cover for kesler. Steel should help with th offense. But a change would be good for the ducks.

To be accurate. Perry has 2 40 goal seasons. So, not really a few. In the 5 years of his big contract he RS numbers are 301 pts in 383games. Ppg of 0.785So prorated to 64 pts over a full season. But last 3 years it’s about a 53 point average.

Playoffs. 57 games with 44 points. Ppg of 0.77 so same pace. Last 3 PO runs however is 15 points in 28 games. 0.53 pace.

He’s slowing down for sure.

Maybe a change is needed for both sides.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
39,940
34,926
He and Getz are the core guys of the ducks. Next longest serving member is Fowler then cogs.

D core is young. Between 21-26 with KB and FB done.

Major shakeup would have to be upfront. Don’t think they have centred coming up to cover for kesler. Steel should help with th offense. But a change would be good for the ducks.

To be accurate. Perry has 2 40 goal seasons. So, not really a few. In the 5 years of his big contract he RS numbers are 301 pts in 383games. Ppg of 0.785So prorated to 64 pts over a full season. But last 3 years it’s about a 53 point average.

Playoffs. 57 games with 44 points. Ppg of 0.77 so same pace. Last 3 PO runs however is 15 points in 28 games. 0.53 pace.

He’s slowing down for sure.

Maybe a change is needed for both sides.
Pretty sure he has a full NTC... so our options would be limited.
 

Alklha

Registered User
Sep 7, 2011
16,875
2,751
I think it'd have to be $5.125M, not an even $5M. Total salary in Perry's last year is $7M. Retention cannot exceed 50% for both salary and cap hit.
These are both calculated on the same percentage basis.

If Anaheim were to retain $3.625m of the cap hit, they would be retaining ~42%. That is the percentage of the salary they would also be liable for, so that dollar liability fluctuates with the contract. So in that final year they would be retaining under $3m in actual dollars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDonald19

Oilers Propagandist

Relax junior, it’s just a post.
Aug 27, 2016
8,064
5,995
Edmonton, AB
Perry woulda been 3rd leading scorer on the oilers too... and hed prob do pretty damn good on mcdavids wing unlike lucic.
Perry is a dinosaur, and a dirty player. No need for the ducks toxic waste.
3rd leading scorer on our team is useless, Oil get a puck moving d he would be #10.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,007
9,638
Pretty sure he has a full NTC... so our options would be limited.
It’s a NMC. He’s in full control. Can’t be removed off the team without his consent unless the ducks buy him out.

Given that he’s been there for 13 years, weather is great, he has a ring, has term and really probably not expecting a contract after this one, he probably doesn’t want to leave.
 

BigTime99

Registered User
Mar 27, 2014
373
92
Why wouldn't you just buy him out rather than retaining money. Ducks would save $6.6mil in cap space for the next 3 years while only having to pay about $2mil per season for the next 6 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: north49er

McDonald19

Registered User
Sep 9, 2003
22,982
3,849
California
Why wouldn't you just buy him out rather than retaining money. Ducks would save $6.6mil in cap space for the next 3 years while only having to pay about $2mil per season for the next 6 years.

With retention they can actually get some assets in return. Also the Ducks owner cares about the real dollars as much as the cap, he doesn't want to pay Perry 4,5,6 years from now.
 

McDonald19

Registered User
Sep 9, 2003
22,982
3,849
California
It’s a NMC. He’s in full control. Can’t be removed off the team without his consent unless the ducks buy him out.

Given that he’s been there for 13 years, weather is great, he has a ring, has term and really probably not expecting a contract after this one, he probably doesn’t want to leave.

That's true, but it might be best for his career to move on. If the buyout isn't an option and he refuses to waive the NMC, the Ducks next course of action could be to give his playing time to young wingers and make him a 4th liner/healthy scratch. We really don't know what Bob Murray and Corey Perry think of this situation. We can only speculate.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,007
9,638
Why wouldn't you just buy him out rather than retaining money. Ducks would save $6.6mil in cap space for the next 3 years while only having to pay about $2mil per season for the next 6 years.
If you go to cap friendly and click on the buyout calculator for perry, the savings each season will shock you.

He has $24 million cash left on his deal. Of that $5.5 million in signing bonus so he gets paid that in full. Remaining $18.5 million is bought out at 2/3. Making cash out a total of $17.8 million.

They also factor in that he was paid more than cap hit taken so far, another $1.9 million.

His dead cap hit for the next 3 years is like $4.2, $2.7, $6 mill. Then 3 years at $2 million.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad