Ola is over-reacting and is overly-emotional and the way he worded his post is a flame but....
What are the hardline teams that are backing Bettman? One would have to conclude that the small market teams like Edmonton and Calgary are there, and after the Melnyk rant, Ottawa too. That's 3 teams. I have no idea where the owners in Vancouver, Montreal and Toronto stand. Technically because of the NHL ban on talking to the media and the fines, it is hard to tell who the hardliners are.
One must think that the top teams financially could live with the NHLPA proposal and the hardline Bettmanites are the small market teams.
One could also include US teams like Pittsburgh, Phoenix, Atlanta, Carolina, Columbus, Nashville and even Florida and Washington, are probably backing Bettman.
To put the onus on Canadian teams as the focal point for 'small market motivations' for some teams backing Bettman, is a tad simplistic....The NHL uses small market Canadian teams more as an example to make its point, but there is a sizeable US ownership community behind the NHL hardline as well.
As Vlad put it well, "How can it be Canada's fault when there are 30 NHL owners but only 6 teams located in Canada (not to mention certain Canadian team owners are in fact Americans, as well as the commissioner)."
The issue is not nationalistic. Its more about the financially profitable markets vs the less profitable markets vs the players and making the NHL more profitable for the 'lessers' so they don't go under; or finding a dummy-proof system where the larger markets don't hurt the smaller markets with salary escalation. The players want to keep their free-market system. Pick a side. It's a battle of wills between various differing financial philosophies, a battle between the billionaires and the millionaires, not a battle of nations.
Get a grip Ola.