topshelf15
Registered User
- May 5, 2009
- 27,993
- 6,005
Yes, only if he stays in Ottawa. I have a more strict criteria than most but think of it this way. If Karlsson leaves in 2 years in free agency, he'll have played 10 years in an Ottawa jersey. He'll sign a 7 year contract and could probably play another couple of years after that. That's half his career in a city not named Ottawa, and probably a Norris or more somewhere else.
I think people that get their jerseys retired should be franchise changing players that accomplished all their major accomplishments with that one franchise.
That's crazy.
Neil was a peripheral player for almost all of his career.
Phillips doesn't deserve it either, but there was a time when he was on the top-pairing of our Stanley Cup final team.
Neil's zenith was potting a few goals on the 3rd line.
You may think its crazy, which is fair I just think Neil brought an element to the team and organization that Phillips didnt. Was never the biggest Phillips fan, always felt he could have been more physical and bring an edge to his game. He was on the shut down pair on the run and he was good at it but he was never a top pairing defenseman. He had some really poor stretches that were masked by a very good team around him. Solid player for sure but I really dont see whats so special about him. Neils ability to play his type of game for so long on one organization is far more unique in my opinion.
Chris Neil was great for this organization on & off the ice. His role wasn't to score goals or contribute offensively it was to keep the other team in check which he did extremely well & back up his teammates. IMO Neil deserves to be in the ring of honour, although as much as I liked Neil, I don't think his number should be retired.
Are you sure about that? He led the team in icetime/game in 07-08, was 2nd in 06-07, 08-09, 09-10 and all that was without ever getting much of anything in PP time. He was considered on of the top shutdown D in the league along with Regehr back in the day.
Nobody called him number one though, the claim was top pairing, which imo is entirely fair.Well he was never a number 1 thats for sure, perhaps number 2 d man but leading a team in icetime doesnt legitimize the player as a number 1 in my opinion. His game was never dynamic enough, perhaps if he had more offensive flair or was an intimidating punishing d man while playing the shut down role he could have got to that level. His ability to raise his game in the playoffs was something that made him a very good player.
Haha...You ruined a perfect post by saying his number should be retired.
I have mentioned this before, but I would like to see a two tiered system.
Top tier would be number retirement, and second tier would be ring of honour.
I would also have some stipulations that guarantee ones entry into either tier, but players could be put in a tier for other reasons even if they didn't meet the stipulations. I would put retire anyone who played 1000 games with the Sens number, and put anyone who spent 10 years with the team in the ring of honour. I think there could be stipulations for goals and points too, but it is a bit hard to say what they should be since they are more era/team dependent than games played. And for goalies there would have to be a different set of rules.
That would give us:
Retired: 11, 4, 25
Ring of Honour: Redden, Spezza, Fisher, Bonk, Smith
I would also argue some other guys like Hossa, Volchenkov, etc should be added to the Ring of Honour even if longevity alone didn't get them there.
Now, I do realize I am a lot more lenient in who I would want having their number retired than most, but I really don't care. We aren't a Montreal or Detroit where anyone who didn't win a cup didn't stand out. We aren't a Pittsburgh or Edmonton who has been handed multiple generational players. We should retire the numbers and honour the guys who meant a lot to this team, and to us as fans. Those guys don't have to be the most skilled players, they just have to be the guys that gave it their all for the Senators. And there should be a point where you have scored enough goals, or points, or excelled in your role enough that you played enough games for this team for enough years that your commitment is undeniable and should be recognized.
Phillips & Neil should definitely NOT have their numbers retired.
Haha...
Yeah, but I'm a big Neil fan
You're right though. Neil and Phillips are 'Ring Of Honour' type of guys.
Interesting to note though that Phillips has had an internal retirement of his number within the organization. Not sure if they'll follow suit for Neil. But even though it won't hang in the rafters, you won't see anyone wear #4 on this team for quite awhile.
#4 would suit Ceci better, as he's following Phillips' trajectory. I hope Chabot ends up with #6 eventually, when Wideman's gone.Chabot should take it.
Should the ring of honour be ONLY for players who have spent their entire career with the Sens? Does Mike Fisher or Jason Spezza get a place on there for all they did as Sen players?
Or Heatley ... the only Sens player to hit back to back 50 goal seasons. We all know that will never happen. hahahaIt's really hard to draw the line.
Does a guy like Hossa belong?
The only way Heatley gets up there is if they honor Pizza Pizza.Or Heatley ... the only Sens player to hit back to back 50 goal seasons. We all know that will never happen. hahaha