CTC
Registered User
- Oct 9, 2014
- 469
- 152
Yeah, that article was a terrible attempt at satire.
Heck, the title of the post literally started with the word "SATIRE", in all caps.
haha, well at least I was put straight, thanks everyone.
Yeah, that article was a terrible attempt at satire.
Heck, the title of the post literally started with the word "SATIRE", in all caps.
Montreal radio just reported Chris Neil has turned down one year and one way contract offers and is waiting for 'the right fit'. I can't remember if they explicitly said 'NHL' but I guess I assumed so. That sounds really weird, should he not just take what he can get (or retire)?
Montreal radio just reported Chris Neil has turned down one year and one way contract offers and is waiting for 'the right fit'. I can't remember if they explicitly said 'NHL' but I guess I assumed so. That sounds really weird, should he not just take what he can get (or retire)?
Montreal radio just reported Chris Neil has turned down one year and one way contract offers and is waiting for 'the right fit'. I can't remember if they explicitly said 'NHL' but I guess I assumed so. That sounds really weird, should he not just take what he can get (or retire)?
Montreal radio just reported Chris Neil has turned down one year and one way contract offers and is waiting for 'the right fit'. I can't remember if they explicitly said 'NHL' but I guess I assumed so. That sounds really weird, should he not just take what he can get (or retire)?
They must have got the feed from TGOR early this morning when they interviewed Neil and he mentioned that. Can't give Montreal credit for that scoop.
I don't believe this for a second. In fact, this sounds like a prelude to a retirement announcement. The truth is that guys with better NHL pedigrees than Neil are being forced to take PTOs right now - not a chance that anyone has given him a one way contract offer, and even less chance that he would turn it down if it was offered. What I fully expect eventually is an announcement from Neil that he couldn't find "the right fit" and as a result is retiring.
I agree it would be odd that he got an offer while better available players are going the route of PTO, but I don't think it would be odd for him to turn down an offer he didn't feel was a good fit. If Colorado offers him a 1 way 1 year deal at 700k with the expectation that he'd be the 13th forward providing locker-room leadership and mentorship all year, why would he accept it? If that's his only offer, I suspect he'd decide that it's not worth uprooting his family for a year to play out his career on a team going through a re-build. Now, if say the Capitals or the Pens were to offer him a 1-way deal, and his role was expected to be a regular on the game day roster, albeit in a 8-10 mins a night 4th liner capacity, he might jump on the opportunity for one last crack at the cup.
I don't believe this for a second. In fact, this sounds like a prelude to a retirement announcement. The truth is that guys with better NHL pedigrees than Neil are being forced to take PTOs right now - not a chance that anyone has given him a one way contract offer, and even less chance that he would turn it down if it was offered. What I fully expect eventually is an announcement from Neil that he couldn't find "the right fit" and as a result is retiring.
Me neither. If Neil was offered a one year one way NHL contract by any team, I am sure he would have signed it by now.
Darren Dreger reported months ago that Neil has offers to play in the NHL this year. For his entire career, even the segments of the fanbase that really like Neil have undervalued him compared to GMs/insiders around the league. But, of course, the sourpatch kids have to concoct a conspiracy theory.
Dreger was simply relaying a story given to him by Neil's agent. Agents and the media have a co-dependent relationship - agents are a great source of inside info for guys like Dreger and in return he'll occasionally go plant a story out there that might help an agent drum up some interest in their client. That story always struck me as what they call spin in the political world - 10 percent truth and 90 percent bullfeathers all wrapped in cotton candy, ready for consumption...
and you know this because Neil's agent told you? Or areyou just pulling stuff out of your ass.
I know this because it is September 11, and Chris Neil remains without an NHL contract.
I know this because it is September 11, and Chris Neil remains without an NHL contract.
I find it interesting that none of the reports come from the teams doing the offering. It's all very vague.
Teams don't typically report that they offered somebody a contract, you know, unless the player has already signed it.
He's also not a big name player, so media isn't going out of their way to get a scoop on who signs Neil.
There was an article the other day where Neil stated that he wasn't sure if he was going to accept a PTO given his age. He also stated that he is considering the impact on his family so it doesn't sound like he wants to move his family.
My guess is that he is probably leaning towards trying to play for Team Canada in the Olympics. With the NHL not allowing players to play in the Olympics this year that means that a player like Neil actually has a pretty good chance of playing. Honestly it would probably mean more to Neil to represent his country and get a chance to win a gold medal in the Olympics than to get a 4th line role on a team that may or may not make the playoffs.
He could still consider playing for Team Canada and it he plays well then he could still try and get an NHL contract to finish off the season.
I'm surprised there were no solid offers for Neil, but a lot of older veterans have been left without contracts so I guess that's just the direction the league is going in.
I don't mean this facetiously, but is Neil really good enough as a pure hockey player to make Team Canada? With the big ice, and general difference in tone of the Olympics vs NHL, wouldn't his biggest asset being that he is a pugilist be irrelevant on the Olympic team?