Jay haller
Registered User
- Oct 22, 2017
- 1,504
- 399
Where is your reasoning? Where is your thought process? How am I able to tell that this is a good trade? How am I able to tell that this makes sense for both teams?CHI gets
Martin
4th
TOR
Seabrook
Trying to unload 50M, I see ...
Not unless you’re retaining a bunch of that contract.CHI gets
Martin
4th
TOR
Seabrook
Bergevin? Then they could run a Alzner-Seabrook pair. I think they would improve their attitude tooI think the only GM's at this point who might be foolish enough to take Seabrook is Jim Benning or Peter Chiarelli.
RD offensive defenseman
'Foundational' player
Is this a joke?CHI gets
Martin
4th
TOR
Seabrook
6 more years vs 2 more of Martin. Seabrook is a better player but this isn't worth it.
I disagree. Someone eventually will in a swap of bad contracts and they'll get a veteran defenseman still able to pitch in in any role he's needed.No one is taking that Seabrook contract
I don't want to trade for Seabrook. But, during his career his offensive production has been known to dip and then spike again. I don't know how worried Hawks fans would be yet.