Trading Hronek leaves a pretty big gaping hole to be filled.
@SopelFanThe3rd
No, not really. See what Willander can do? Why not? Elias Pettersson, McWard or Brisebois. What's the sense of having a farm team if you are too afraid to promote a player. Juulsen too but he might just be the replacement for Cole.
There's a lot of guys I'd try to unload for cap reasons, before sacrificing Hronek. Obviously trading Mikheyev would be one option......but clearly they'd have to retain salary.
The other options, many will find unpalatable is to deal either Demko or Boeser. At this juncture, you could get a king's ransom for both, since their value is at the top of the market.
The bottom line is that right, shot, top-pairing d-men like Hronek who wrack up 50 points a season are as scarce as hen's teeth. That's why the Canucks blew out a first rounder and second rounder to acquire him in the first place.
You could name ten players YOU would want to unload for cap reasons.
Like Boeser and Garland, how did that work out last year?
Demko could be a maybe but the team doesn't really have a full time apprentice as a back up. Can't go with DeSmith as a starter, could you? Maybe a 1A and 1B?
Demko to NJD, Buffalo, TO, Ottawa, Columbus, apart from TO the others have enough high value assets to trade, Buffalo may deal Samuelsson now they have Byram, NJD - Bahl, Foote, Columbus - Marchenko/Voronkov but this deal would have to include Garland/Boeser, Ottawa - Pinto but Norris may be done now so who else?, TO - nah for get them.
It is okay because the vultures are going to swoop down n the Canucks and pick off Myers, Zadorov and Cole leaving the team in a crater. Especially if fans can't adjust their thinking to the cap actually increasing year after year.
Here is something to think on, with the move to Utah league revenues will increase across the board.
Besides any partner with Hughes will likely get 50 points just passing it to him. But a puck handling rushing dman will always be second fiddle when Hughes is on the ice. Only one puck.
Big ticket trade assets, Demko AAA, Hronek AA, Garland A, Boeser BBB
All are veteran guys that a team like Utah will want to get a jump on their first season and have most assets that they can even handle. Only 50 contracts per team, they already have at least 46 used and they have over 20 picks in the top three over the next 3 years. They have room for 4 more contracts so they will be wanting to cash in on some of those other assets. They will also have more than 40 million in cap space with 18 NHL contracts already.
They may see trading Crouse and a couple of 2nds as a good trade for Garland and Boeser.
Or Crouse and But/Simkev for Hronek
what ever they can do anything and not really hurt the team long term but the leadership of vets like Boeser and Garland would help.
Boeser, Garland, Hronek
For
Crouse, McBain, Simashev, But and three 2nd rnd picks would be a fair trade.
I guess the other aspect to think on is who stays with the team and team needs and Tocchets wants.
The above mentioned trade would free up about an additional 10 million taking the Canucks to 35 mil in cap space with 7 NHL contracts to re-sign if all the forwards re-sign here.
But it this team good enough? One playoff appearance in one year doesn't mean it is finished or good enough. The Canucks had a 100+ point season in 2015 and then 8/9 years of skimming the bottom of the league.
Let's see, if your Vancouver Canucks want to compete now and in the future instead of regressing to the mean:
Keep:
Lindholm-Unicorn
Zadorov-Unicorn
Joshua-Quasi-Unicorn
Hronek-Quasi-Unicorn
Myers-Quasi-Unicorn
Let walk:
Cole-Replaceable with Juulsen
Bleuger-Replaceable with Sasson/Aman
Lafferty-Replaceable with Pods/Bains
DeSmith-Replaceable with Silovs
If I get the unicorn reference correct you're meaning hard to replace. Ya.
Oddly enough they may have Hronek's replacement already Willander, McWard, a farm hand?