Kometsman
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2017
- 31
- 1
I would have to say only one - Kansas City. Because the Mavericks are the only ones that can be put in a stable.
I'll play along while others are arguing semantics ... Adirondack, Allen, Colorado ('til the end of this season), Florida, Fort Wayne, Indy, Missouri, Orlando, Toledo, Wheeling (despite themselves). Those seem to have the best chance of 3-year survival as they exist today. Anything much beyond is gravy in minor pro hockey.
Unless the DeVos Family purchased the Solar Bears last spring simply to take a loss then kick them out onto the Streets of Disney (which I suppose is possible), I'll keep Orlando on my short list.IF St. John's gets in as rumored with Toronto's dual affiliation... that puts Orlando in question
I think Worcester has embraced the ECHL so far, but because they'd be an island without Manchester or Maine, I think they'll try to position for AHL relocation given how that league is now just a place to shuffle people annually.
IF St. John's gets in as rumored with Toronto's dual affiliation... that puts Orlando in question
Norfolk has committed for another three years, from what I saw there locally.....It would take away their affiliation but I doubt they're in jeopardy considering they were recently bought by the owners of the Orlando Magic.
My list of what I consider stable teams (without a defining characteristic to base it on)
KC (owned by Lamar Hunt), Rapid City, Witchita, Fort Wayne, Allen, Idaho, Utah, Cincinnati, Orlando, Florida, Toledo, Tulsa, Jacksonville, South Carolina, not sure about Atlanta but I'll put them on my list, I'll say Portland considering their ownership but that may be premature.
I hope Norfolk and Manchester can find a way to revive their attendance figures, maybe in the case of Norfolk that could be helped with better owners.
If by some miracle Cincinnati is actually able to do the US Bank Arena renovation/rebuild then the Cyclones may have to go dark during that time, No other arena in Cincinnati has ice making capabilites and I highly doubt they will play at practice rink like Northlands or SportsPlus. However I dont think the rebuild will happen seeing as how it is so far down on the counties list behind the Western Hills Viaduct, and an FC Cincinnati Stadium. Not to mention just announced in the past few days is that the county is looking at placing an indoor/outdoor music venue nearby at The Banks development. At This point unless the arena owner and operator will take on full cost (doubtful) at best I could only see a minor renovation rather than a rebuild.
The IceMen front office must've read your post, Rock, and dropped their average attendance by 10 heads to 5587....
Cincinnati 5245
Florida 5315
Jacksonville 5597
Orlando 5650
Tulsa 5908
Ft Wayne 7701
Toledo 7474
Florida, Orlando and Ft. Wayne numbers are heavily juiced. I've been to enough games at each venue to draw this conclusion. Evansville's announced number were a fiction (or they still would be there), so I'll assume Jacksonville's numbers (same owner) are probably too high. ...
IF St. John's gets in as rumored with Toronto's dual affiliation... that puts Orlando in question
I can't see any team wanting to transfer to St John's. The transportation to the city can only be done by air. Just so prohibitive expensive. The Leafs left St John's because the team was too busy travelling instead of resting and practising Not saying that the ECHL is a development league, St John's just too darn expensive and inconvenient.
that's what we thought, but it's happening.... the Edge group isn't going to be a roadblock because Courteau is the roadblock in the Q.... AND that's already happened based off the Telegram's reporting.... now comes the confirmation that this ECHL Group has a lease with Mile One and SJSE, as it appears the exclusivity window is being slammed shut, and then official confirmation that a new franchise is coming to NFLD.... what name it takes from there remains to be seen.
Florida, Orlando and Ft. Wayne numbers are heavily juiced. I've been to enough games at each venue to draw this conclusion. Evansville's announced number were a fiction (or they still would be there), so I'll assume Jacksonville's numbers (same owner) are probably too high.
Don't know about Tulsa. Toledo's announced numbers have always seemed reasonable when I've been there. The Cyclones announce number in the building. If they used any of the other team's methodologies I'm pretty sure that their announced numbers would be higher than anyone but Toledo's and perhaps Tulsa's.
I know a lot of teams will use the number of tickets distributed (paid for or comped) rather than the drop. I have seen pictures/video that Jacksonville has had some crowds of 5-6k but that was early in the season. And yes many teams do come up with numbers that are vastly different from what the actual numbers are.
Thanks for this. Good for the folks of St John's. Hope it doesn't hurt the junior team attendance/finances. I've never been concerned if owners make or lose money...hey it's their money. And even the NHL have never been that concerned about ownership either, as long as the owners, "promised" to pay their bills, which hasn't always happened.
I was in the same thought because Lewiston went that way, and Courteau is exactly the same now as he was when Lewiston left or "terminated" DESPITE being a charter member....
St. John's lost the Q BUT Saint John WAS THOUGHT to be their rival back then, BEFORE the Ice Caps EXISTED.
BTW, Courteau, had a lot of fascination with placing a Q team in Montreal, which finally backfired, now with Laval and the Canadiens being there likely had a lot to do with it. St. John's Q Team is now in Blainville Boisbriand, as the Armada