Cam Neely or Pavel Bure

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by canucksfan, Nov 9, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. canucksfan

    canucksfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    33,661
    Likes Received:
    264
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Location:
    British Columbia
    Home Page:
    Who was better? Neely or Bure
     
  2. Jim Carey Price

    Jim Carey Price Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,212
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    SAP Consultant
    Location:
    Ottawa, ON
    Home Page:
    clearly Neely...more complete player
    Bure's a pure goal scorer but cant match Neely's bests

    who else can score 50 in 44
     
  3. Bruinguy

    Bruinguy Here we are again!

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2003
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Stuck in LeafNation
    Absolutely Neely. Not taking one bit of credit away from Bure but Neely was more of a complete package. Besides, you'd never see Pavel grab Claude Lemieux and heave him 6 feet into the boards!

    I still must say though that Bure was absolutely electrifying!
     
  4. God Bless Canada

    God Bless Canada Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Newspaper reporter
    Location:
    Bentley reunion
    This one isn't even close. Bure was one-dimensional and a detriment to the team when he didn't have the puck.

    Outside of Mark Messier, nobody has combined goal scoring ability and physical play like Cam Neely over the past 30 years.
     
  5. Big Phil

    Big Phil Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    26,992
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Personally I said Bure. He actuallt LED his team to a Cup final appearane and had 34 points in the playoffs that year. Neely never did that to Bure's extent. Neely gets really overrated on these boards IMO. Bure won major awards when Neely didnt.
     
  6. neelysbiggestfan

    neelysbiggestfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2004
    Messages:
    814
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Neely led the Bruins to the Cup Finals twice.
    In 1990, he had 16 goals!! (20 points) in 19 games while being about the only player on the Bruins that could score.
    Also, led the bruins in scoring in the 89 playoffs with 28 points in 22 games.
     
  7. God Bless Canada

    God Bless Canada Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Newspaper reporter
    Location:
    Bentley reunion
    You're right, Phil, Neely never led his team to A finals appearance. He led his team to two finals appearances. Neely was a critical part of Boston reaching the Cup final in 1988 and 1990. His play against Montreal was a big reason the Bruins beat the Habs in 1988, the first time Boston had beaten Montreal in an eternity. His 1990 play was some of the best of his career, surprassed only by 1991, when he scored 16 goals - one off the playoff record - in 19 games.

    Plus, let's not forget that the true MVP in the Canucks' 1994 Cup run was Kirk McLean. The Canucks don't go anywhere without his heroics throughout the series vs. Calgary. And for my money, Trevor Linden was a much more valuable all-round contributor to the Canucks' success throughout the playoffs than Bure. Bure was dominant against Dallas, but inconsistent and at time invisible in the other three series.

    Plus, Neely never pulled a Houdini disappearing act in the playoffs like Bure did in 1992, 1993 or especially 2000.
     
  8. jiggs 10

    jiggs 10 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    3,541
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hockeytown, ND
    Home Page:
    Totally different kinds of players. If I needed a goal to win a game, I'm going with Bure. But Neely did other things better, so for a whole game I'd go with Neely. But I enjoyed Bure's style more, because he was so electrifying to watch. Neely was more of a bull in the china shop with good hands.

    But since they are completely different players, I don't see what difference it would make.
     
  9. monster_bertuzzi

    monster_bertuzzi registered user

    Joined:
    May 26, 2003
    Messages:
    32,734
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Home Page:
    Bure scored 60 in 77 - not too bad. BTW it was 50 in 49 for Neely.
     
  10. Birko19

    Birko19 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Messages:
    11,198
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hamilton, Ont
    Home Page:
    Pavel Bure no doubt, but Neely is not far behind.
     
  11. Habsaholic

    Habsaholic Registered User

    Joined:
    May 23, 2004
    Messages:
    518
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I voted Neely, its close though. Bure is more skilled but easier to contain
     
  12. helps that neely have oates as his center and bourque behind him. bure had to do everything by himself.
     
  13. Mike Bossy*

    Mike Bossy* Guest

    GP G A Pts

    726 395 299 694 (Cam Neely)
    702 437 342 779 (Pavel Bure)

    I'd rather have Pavel Bure on my team.
     
  14. ahmon

    ahmon Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,843
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Home Page:
    skill - bure
    complete - neely

    as a canucks fan bure

    as a hockey fan bure as well ( pure excitement)

    but a player to build around for a cup run... neely
     
  15. Green Star

    Green Star Seggy #91

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,541
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    129
    Occupation:
    Whom know
    Location:
    Im the guy next door
    Home Page:
    I choose Bure too, just bcause we was my favorite player. And I think he is so darn dangerous everytime he is on the ice, man I wish he would have the pleasure of playing in the new NHL.

    Anyway, why choose? ya got a Pavel Bure and Cam Neely mold into one player... Alexander Ovechkin :teach:
     
  16. McGuillicuddy

    McGuillicuddy Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,138
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    96
    No. It was 50 in 44.

    He ended up with 50 in 49 for that season because he was playing injured and didn't score in his last 5 games before he had to hang it up for that year. But that does not change the fact that Neely put away 50 goals in his first 44 games.
     
  17. McGuillicuddy

    McGuillicuddy Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,138
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Oh, and I'd take Neely easily. He was certainly in the same league as Bure in the goal-scoring department, could hit like a freight train, and put his team on his back enroute to 2 Stanley Cup finals. No contest.
     
  18. 12# Peter Bondra

    12# Peter Bondra Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    8,688
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  19. benji

    benji Took too much, man.

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2002
    Messages:
    10,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Too much.
    Home Page:
    I've always loved Bure, but I have to go with Neely here.
     
  20. Skk82

    Skk82 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Arlington, VA
    if it's a shootout, bure. elsewise i'd want neely.
     
  21. wilka91*

    wilka91* Registered User

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    4,251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I can't believe that some people actually voted for Neely! It's a joke!
     
  22. God Bless Canada

    God Bless Canada Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Newspaper reporter
    Location:
    Bentley reunion
    There is far more to this game than points, ie, physical play and leadership. Neely's one of the greatest combinations of goal-scoring and physical play ever, and likely No. 2 for the last quarter century. (Behind only Messier). He was also a better leader and a better player in the clutch. If the puck wasn't on Bure's stick, he was of very little use.
     
  23. canucksfan

    canucksfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    33,661
    Likes Received:
    264
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Location:
    British Columbia
    Home Page:
    You obviously haven't seen Neely play. I voted for Neely and I really didn't have to think about it twice.
     
  24. wilka91*

    wilka91* Registered User

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    4,251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yeah whatever ...

    at least 60% voted for Bure
     
  25. Nifty=HHOF

    Nifty=HHOF Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Depressed Yankee Land
    Cam Neely was a far better overall player than Bure, this poll result is insane. Unless there are too many voters who were too young to really see/appreciate Neely in his heyday.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"