pappyline
Registered User
Gotta be Max Bentley, the dipsy doodle dandy. Also Lemieux & Perreault. Gordie Howe is also up there. He was ambidextous and could switch from right to left. Another advantage of the staight blade.
jiggs 10 said:Denis Savard had the greatest hands I've ever seen. Could do ANYTHING with the puck!
Mario is up there, too.
Pierre Larouche was a good answer.
Kent Nilsson. He wasn't called "Magic" for nothing!
From everything I've read on the old days, Max Bentley of the Hawks was the best of his era.
Kovalev? I must not see him play enough. He seems to me to be a lesser Pierre Turgeon, but I only see him about once a season until the playoffs, so....
God Bless Canada said:In terms of another hands skill - deflections (yes, it does count) - the two that come to mind are Robitaille (as mentioned early, he survived in the league for so long because he has the magic hands) and Joe Nieuwendyk. An absolute constant threat in front of the net on the power play. Those hands (and his uncanny knack for raising his play at the right time) will be his ticket into the HHOF. (Also used those quick hands to be one of the top faceoff men in the league).
Whoever mentioned Klima gets a big thumbs up. For those who think hockey is all about skill, I give you evidence as to why it's not. If it was all about skill, Klima's in the HHOF. He had elite everything in terms of offensive talent, but he had wavering consistency, intensity and determination - the traits that the all-time greats possessed. That's why he bounced around, that's why he was in the minors at age 31, and that's why his career never matched his talent.
I've watched Kovalev play since day one, at least 500 games. Haven't seen much of him this year, mind you, but career-wise he has a fairly predictable game. For all the slick moves, he loses the puck more often than he beats people. And most of the time he does beat someone, the next defender in line strips the puck from him. I've seen him stripped a thousand times with too much stick work, despite the countless times he's been benched mid-game because of it hurting his team.jiggs 10 said:Kovalev? I must not see him play enough. He seems to me to be a lesser Pierre Turgeon, but I only see him about once a season until the playoffs, so....
ExtremeHockeyFan said:I've watched Kovalev play since day one, at least 500 games. Haven't seen much of him this year, mind you, but career-wise he has a fairly predictable game. For all the slick moves, he loses the puck more often than he beats people. And most of the time he does beat someone, the next defender in line strips the puck from him. I've seen him stripped a thousand times with too much stick work, despite the countless times he's been benched mid-game because of it hurting his team.
If aesthetics make for great hands, I guess he is outstanding. If, however, you are looking for something a bit more important than aesthetics, like actual results, his "great" hands hurt his teams as often as they help them.
Kovalev's hands in my opinion are a blessing and a curse. His hands create some amazing things on the ice, but his mind over-estimates what his hands are actually capable of. When this happens, his lack of hockey sense turns his great hands into a liability.
In essence, a pair of great hands also knows when to get rid of the puck.
ExtremeHockeyFan said:I've watched Kovalev play since day one, at least 500 games. Haven't seen much of him this year, mind you, but career-wise he has a fairly predictable game. For all the slick moves, he loses the puck more often than he beats people. And most of the time he does beat someone, the next defender in line strips the puck from him. I've seen him stripped a thousand times with too much stick work, despite the countless times he's been benched mid-game because of it hurting his team.
If aesthetics make for great hands, I guess he is outstanding. If, however, you are looking for something a bit more important than aesthetics, like actual results, his "great" hands hurt his teams as often as they help them.
Kovalev's hands in my opinion are a blessing and a curse. His hands create some amazing things on the ice, but his mind over-estimates what his hands are actually capable of. When this happens, his lack of hockey sense turns his great hands into a liability.
In essence, a pair of great hands also knows when to get rid of the puck.
As I stated, I have not seen much of him this year at all. But as a Ranger fan who watches basically every Ranger game, and with Pitt in my division, I saw a lot of his career from day one. Again, easily 500 games. Kovalev ... great hands, bad brain. The two often collide.KOVALEV10 said:I dont know which Kovy you have seen but this year he rarely and I mean rarely loses the puck. Every game he puts on a show at least one shift where he pretty much dekes the whole team, comes back to the blueline, spins and then takes a shot. However he has some games where you could tell that he's just floating around, and if you happen to be watching those games he will show you what lack of desire and footspeed does to a player. He'll end up creating turnovers everytime. Not when he's on though.. not when he's on.
bakinturkey said:started one these with the fastest skater now just curious on who has the softest hands from others opinions