By the time CTV gets this deal (if they manage to get it), I really do believe that television will change enough that we can pick and choose which game we want to see. With the advent of new digital and satellite television channels (the article mentions a TSN2 type channel) and internet streaming technology improving, I think a fresh, new broadcaster will give us the ability to see whatever we want, when we want. It's the way that media has been changing in recent years, and I think in a couple of years, this will become the norm.
I love that idea, but why can't the CBC be the channel to give that to us?
Old man Cole and company won't be around forever, and regardless of whether or not the HNIC crew wants to modernise (in terms of younger talent), time has finally caught up with most of them.
And dear god I can't see how people think TSN with Pierre 'Bird-like head jerks' McGuire, and the annoying 'reporters' from their Sports News desks are any better. If I have to hear Darren 'Dutchy' say "he goes roof daddy" with an expression of self worth one more time I'm going to puke.
Seriously I'm asking what TSN does better in their national hockey broadcasts than CBC does?
-Do you ever watch CTV News or Global National News? ... CBC ranks third in national news, see
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...60210/20060210
-In Edmonton, the local CBC news hardly registers on the radar. It seems in the last few years it’s a flip flop between Global and CTV on who is #1 and #2...
-As for the skewed news, it can be argued that CBC has a left wing biased to a lot of its news and documentary programs. Both CTV and Global are fairly objective in their newscasts even though they're privately owned...
TV Ratings arn't always a reflection of quality.. Hell, I'm not 100% certain, but I'm fairly sure FOX news is the most popular news channel within the United States. Does that mean it is in any way good? heck no. I mean look at the horrible shows that go on to get massive ratings, while the best of the best get canceled.
I'll admit though, CTV is pretty good, but that is a matter of luck of ownership if anything. CTV and its highest parent ownership included Kenneth Thomson, who was well known as a great person who never interfered with the editorial content of his newspaper or T.V. holdings. Hopefully his son is the same way (he recently inherited the company).
As for Global, I'd argue it is a somewhat partisan, right leaning,
Alberta/West focused channel. It's the closest thing to FOX news in Canada, even if it remains a very distant and much more respectible cousin. That's okay though, oil provinces have a self interest in making sure they can maximize their revenues before the praries turn into deserts because of global warming and loss of access to water due to the oil industry (just kidding).
As for the CBC having a left leaning bias I wouldn't completely disagree, but often I think they draw attention to left leaning issues, instead of simply shoving a specific viewpoint of their anchors down peoples throats (which I think Global does on occasion). They'll have panels that might include right or left, or various other interest groups, but they usually have both sides of the conflict present. For example, the CBC is covering the World AIDs Convention in Toronto more than any major news channel in Canada, is that because they are left leaning, or because it is a real problem that shouldn't be ignored? (if you ask Harper, it doesn't matter enough to make an appearance, though I applaud him for going North to assert our claims on the North..). But then look at the CBC a week or two earlier, with coverage heavily focused on asserting our claims in the North, a Conservative platform issue (though it should have been an all party issue, but such is the idiocy of partisan politics).
And also this: "Reality has a well known liberial (left) bias". -Stephen Colbert.