ATD2018 - Trade Thread

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
30,850
13,635
Please post your trades below, they are not processed until 4/5 GMs agree that it is allowed.

To make things easier on the trading committee (and the people updating the OP), please post both the round number and the exact pick numbers that you are trading, and please post your team names, not just GM names.

For full pick swaps just both parties need to post confirmation and it will be processed immediately

Please try to avoid On-The-Clock trading, it's rude to other GMs. But we understand in some cases it's necessary

Trade-Counter

BenchBrawl: 8
ImporterExporter: 6
rmartin65: 6
ResilientBeast: 4
TorontoTrades: 4
Sprague Cleghorn: 3
Velociraptor: 3
overpass: 2
jarek: 2
tinyzombies: 2
VanIslander: 2
JohnnyEngine: 2
Namba_17: 2
Stoneberg/markrander87: 2
Iceman: 2
Voight: 1
papershoes/HT18: 1
29Goalhoglung: 1
papershoes/Hawkey Town 18: 1
TheDevilMadeMe/Dreakmur: 1
Habsfan18: 1


Trades:

To jarek: 40th,88th,136th,184th
To BenchBrawl: 27th,118th,123th,214th

-

To Stoneberg & markrander87 - Halifax Citadels: 41 (2nd), 56 (3rd), 89 (4th), 185 (8th)
To Namba 17 - Portage Lakes Hockey Club 21 (1st) 76 (4th) 124 (6th), 165 (7th)

-

To Railers: 46, 51, 94
To Bankers: 24, 72, 121
 
Last edited:

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,539
4,915
Please post your trades below, they are not processed until 4/5 GMs agree that it is allowed.

Technical question: With 24 entries, 4/5 GMs amounts to a fractional number. Are 19 or 20 yes votes going to be required?
 

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
30,850
13,635
I just copied/pasted from last year, 3 vet GMs is enough, and in some minor trades or standard trades cases 2 should do it.If the trade is controversial this is where we need more GMs like 4-5
 

jarek

Registered User
Aug 15, 2009
10,004
238
Apparently we already have a trade. RB and I are swapping our entire pick sets. 22nd for 12th.

RB to confirm.
 

ResilientBeast

Proud Member of the TTSAOA
Jul 1, 2012
13,903
3,557
Edmonton
Uhmm I didn't confirm that

I put it out there but I'm still thinking

I like to see all the options :laugh:
 
Last edited:

Iceman

Registered User
Jun 9, 2014
10,640
2,024
Trade to announce:

Iceman and ResillientBeast - Complete swap of picks.


RB to confirm.
 

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
30,850
13,635
Trade to announce:

To jarek - Kingsman Secret Agents: 40, 88, 136, 201

To BenchBrawl - Montreal Canadiens: 27, 118, 123, 214
 

Iceman

Registered User
Jun 9, 2014
10,640
2,024
I always thought that the person moving up first in a 4 piece trade should move up in the fourth pick and not third but we've seen plenty of these trades too so I guess it's fine, the pick difference is ok.... I guess? :P
 

rmartin65

Registered User
Apr 7, 2011
2,667
2,147
I think one side comes out a bit ahead, but it is two experienced GMs, so... sure, I guess.

That said, I dont understand trades this early. If someone unexpectedly drops, the people who preemptively trade back are going to have some serious regret.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iceman

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
30,850
13,635
I think one side comes out a bit ahead, but it is two experienced GMs, so... sure, I guess.

That said, I dont understand trades this early. If someone unexpectedly drops, the people who preemptively trade back are going to have some serious regret.

No guts no glory :D
 

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
30,850
13,635
Which is easier to say/live with as the person trading up.

OK, but in this specific case no one will drop to 27th that matters.I don't see any player where jarek would severely regret trading it.It's always the same players in this area.

Honestly, I feel like *I* might regret it if someone falls to 40th, and this is a more likely scenario based on past drafts.
 

rmartin65

Registered User
Apr 7, 2011
2,667
2,147
OK, but in this specific case no one will drop to 27th that matters.I don't see any player where jarek would severely regret trading it.It's always the same players in this area.

Honestly, I feel like *I* might regret it if someone falls to 40th, and this is a more likely scenario based on past drafts.

It is quite possible that no one drops. Then again, someone might; that is why I said unexpectedly.

I mean, did anybody really see Howe going first this year? I am not saying it is a bad pick at all, but I strongly believe that it came out of left field for most people here.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->