ATD REDUX: Brooklyn Americans vs. Seattle Soakers
- Thread starter VanIslander
- Start date
VanIslander
A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Brooklyn:
PP1: Ted Lindsay - Sid Abel - Gordie Howe - Harry Cameron - Flash Hollett
PP2: Marty Barry - Ryan Getzlaf - Bernie Morris - Earl Seibert - Victor Hedman
PK1: Patrice Bergeron - Herbie Lewis - Harvey Pulford - Earl Seibert
PK2: Rusty Crawford - Gordie Howe - Vitali Davydov - Victor Hedman
Seattle:
PP1: Goulet - Hawerchuk - Mogilny - Potvin - Duchesne
PP2: Kurri - Yzerman - Lindros - Quackenbush - Hatcher
PK1: Kurri - Tikkanen - Tinordi - Hatcher
PK2: Yzerman - Larmer - Potvin - Quackenbush
PP1: Ted Lindsay - Sid Abel - Gordie Howe - Harry Cameron - Flash Hollett
PP2: Marty Barry - Ryan Getzlaf - Bernie Morris - Earl Seibert - Victor Hedman
PK1: Patrice Bergeron - Herbie Lewis - Harvey Pulford - Earl Seibert
PK2: Rusty Crawford - Gordie Howe - Vitali Davydov - Victor Hedman
Seattle:
PP1: Goulet - Hawerchuk - Mogilny - Potvin - Duchesne
PP2: Kurri - Yzerman - Lindros - Quackenbush - Hatcher
PK1: Kurri - Tikkanen - Tinordi - Hatcher
PK2: Yzerman - Larmer - Potvin - Quackenbush
Last edited:
VanIslander
A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
tabness
be a playa
- Apr 4, 2014
- 2,006
- 3,540
So against Brooklyn I'd suggest the following lineup to Arbour, at home (road can stay something like what's posted).
Tikkanen • Yzerman • Kurri
Goulet • Lindros • Larmer
Nash • Hawerchuk • Mogilny
Walker • Sanderson • Foyston
Potvin • Quackenbush
Tinordi • Hatcher/Egan
Ramsey • Svehla/Egan
Taking advantage of getting Potvin and Quackenbush together a lot against the Production Line at home.
I don't think Seattle needs Duchesne's firepower as much against Brooklyn, just play it close and counterattack.
In general, I feel my team is well built to handle Gordie Howe. I know in the original six days, the winger/winger matchup was big, whereas in the more modern game, it is the defense itself, but either way, my left wing and left defense goes deep in guys who would matchup as well as you could with Howe.
Sanderson of course is well known for not being intimidated by Howe and would pester him, so that's why he's gonna be in the lineup at least at home where he can get some matchups to shadow him. As Tom Johnson said "There was one player Gordie was not sure how to take — this was after I was finished and involved with the Bruins. That was Derek Sanderson, he wasn’t sure how to take him because he didn’t know whether Sanderson was going to hit him over the head, or spear him, or punch his eyes out. But Howe was the ultimate in physical play in the league at that time."
I'm looking to Tikkanen as well as being a super pest here, and Goulet and Nash in the roles they got on my team should at least be responsible enough defensively.
If Gordie wants to play down the middle, I'm more than happy in my top two centers (players really) Lindros and Yzerman being matched up against him, power (which was Gordie's nickname, but Lindros would be the one guy even more deserving) or silk.
Of course on defense, there are the tough mofos Potvin and Tinordi to have to beat, as well as Ramsey (or Quackenbush even on the road where I think he'd be best split up from Potvin).
Despite everything written about Walker's renowned defense, on the road, I like him and Foyston against Brooklyn's speedy but smaller second line, as the size issue won't be there as much.
I will point out that whereas the Production Line guys did what they did in real life playing with each other (and no Kelly on the backend), my guys generally are seeing an upgrade to their real linemates and at the blueline, except of course Kurri, but hey, it certainly doesn't seem that Kurri's stats are taken at face value given where he goes in this thing, because in the mid eighties you're looking at a 65-80 goal, 135-150 point player (per 80 game season) who was excellent defensively and only scored an extremely low 20ish% of his points on the powerplay. If peak Kurri is just a 50 goal, 110 point guy with Yzerman instead of Gretzky (and I think I'm being conservative dropping 15-30 goals, 25-40 points), that's still real good.
Same thing with Bergeron's line, I think he's taking a downgrade on Brooklyn as compared to guys he really plays with.
Lastly, while I made it a point to take good road performers mainly because the traits that factor into that were what I was looking for in this team style, I was cognizant that my teams would generally get voted lower in these things and have to win on the road as well lol
To review:
NHL Stats
Lindros in his peak first five years from 1992-1993 to 1996-1997, was second in road even strength points with 150, three behind Jagr who played 175 games as compared to Lindros playing 149 (Lindros is obviously tops in this stat per game). Despite playing 26 less games, Lindros led the way with 73 goals as compared to Jagr's 70 too. Of course, his +54 was top notch, only behind Fedorov +66 and Yzerman +58 in terms of forwards (add Konstantinov +65, Bourque and Chelios +55 if you want to include defensemen).
NHL Stats
The number three guy in the Lindros timeframe was none other than Yzerman with 144 even strength points in 175 road games. To stretch it back some, Yzerman scored a league leading 334 even strength points in 366 road games in a ten year span from 1987-1988 to 1996-1997 (stats are even more flattering if you pick the shorter timeframe of his best offensive years), leading Gretzky who had 313 in 350 games (Lemieux had 265 in 257 games in that same timeframe which was pretty much his prime). His road +67 is also the best in that time frame until you get down to number 43 on that list Ray Bourque with +88 (Gretzky is -35 in that span, Lemieux +9). More impressively I think, Yzerman also co-led in road even strength goals with 151 of them, he tied none other than the premier goal scorer of that time, Brett Hull (Brett played one less game, but Yzerman also had 21 shorties compared to Brett's 11). Way above third place Stephane Richer (yes I got him too lol) with 120 and Mario with 113.
Of course, aside from those top guys, I spoke about the road performance of various players I picked when I drafted them. This team is built to win when not at home.
Tikkanen • Yzerman • Kurri
Goulet • Lindros • Larmer
Nash • Hawerchuk • Mogilny
Walker • Sanderson • Foyston
Potvin • Quackenbush
Tinordi • Hatcher/Egan
Ramsey • Svehla/Egan
Taking advantage of getting Potvin and Quackenbush together a lot against the Production Line at home.
I don't think Seattle needs Duchesne's firepower as much against Brooklyn, just play it close and counterattack.
In general, I feel my team is well built to handle Gordie Howe. I know in the original six days, the winger/winger matchup was big, whereas in the more modern game, it is the defense itself, but either way, my left wing and left defense goes deep in guys who would matchup as well as you could with Howe.
Sanderson of course is well known for not being intimidated by Howe and would pester him, so that's why he's gonna be in the lineup at least at home where he can get some matchups to shadow him. As Tom Johnson said "There was one player Gordie was not sure how to take — this was after I was finished and involved with the Bruins. That was Derek Sanderson, he wasn’t sure how to take him because he didn’t know whether Sanderson was going to hit him over the head, or spear him, or punch his eyes out. But Howe was the ultimate in physical play in the league at that time."
I'm looking to Tikkanen as well as being a super pest here, and Goulet and Nash in the roles they got on my team should at least be responsible enough defensively.
If Gordie wants to play down the middle, I'm more than happy in my top two centers (players really) Lindros and Yzerman being matched up against him, power (which was Gordie's nickname, but Lindros would be the one guy even more deserving) or silk.
Of course on defense, there are the tough mofos Potvin and Tinordi to have to beat, as well as Ramsey (or Quackenbush even on the road where I think he'd be best split up from Potvin).
Despite everything written about Walker's renowned defense, on the road, I like him and Foyston against Brooklyn's speedy but smaller second line, as the size issue won't be there as much.
I will point out that whereas the Production Line guys did what they did in real life playing with each other (and no Kelly on the backend), my guys generally are seeing an upgrade to their real linemates and at the blueline, except of course Kurri, but hey, it certainly doesn't seem that Kurri's stats are taken at face value given where he goes in this thing, because in the mid eighties you're looking at a 65-80 goal, 135-150 point player (per 80 game season) who was excellent defensively and only scored an extremely low 20ish% of his points on the powerplay. If peak Kurri is just a 50 goal, 110 point guy with Yzerman instead of Gretzky (and I think I'm being conservative dropping 15-30 goals, 25-40 points), that's still real good.
Same thing with Bergeron's line, I think he's taking a downgrade on Brooklyn as compared to guys he really plays with.
Lastly, while I made it a point to take good road performers mainly because the traits that factor into that were what I was looking for in this team style, I was cognizant that my teams would generally get voted lower in these things and have to win on the road as well lol
To review:
NHL Stats
Lindros in his peak first five years from 1992-1993 to 1996-1997, was second in road even strength points with 150, three behind Jagr who played 175 games as compared to Lindros playing 149 (Lindros is obviously tops in this stat per game). Despite playing 26 less games, Lindros led the way with 73 goals as compared to Jagr's 70 too. Of course, his +54 was top notch, only behind Fedorov +66 and Yzerman +58 in terms of forwards (add Konstantinov +65, Bourque and Chelios +55 if you want to include defensemen).
NHL Stats
The number three guy in the Lindros timeframe was none other than Yzerman with 144 even strength points in 175 road games. To stretch it back some, Yzerman scored a league leading 334 even strength points in 366 road games in a ten year span from 1987-1988 to 1996-1997 (stats are even more flattering if you pick the shorter timeframe of his best offensive years), leading Gretzky who had 313 in 350 games (Lemieux had 265 in 257 games in that same timeframe which was pretty much his prime). His road +67 is also the best in that time frame until you get down to number 43 on that list Ray Bourque with +88 (Gretzky is -35 in that span, Lemieux +9). More impressively I think, Yzerman also co-led in road even strength goals with 151 of them, he tied none other than the premier goal scorer of that time, Brett Hull (Brett played one less game, but Yzerman also had 21 shorties compared to Brett's 11). Way above third place Stephane Richer (yes I got him too lol) with 120 and Mario with 113.
Of course, aside from those top guys, I spoke about the road performance of various players I picked when I drafted them. This team is built to win when not at home.
TheDevilMadeMe
Registered User
I had an exhausting week at work, so not much time or energy now. Just one thing from now:
While focusing on slowing down Gordie Howe is understandable, leaving Ted Lindsay (probably the 2nd best offensive player in this series, unless you place an extremely high emphasis on either Yzerman's single season peak or Lindros' per-game pace) to run rampant against the likes of Svehla, Egan, and Kevin Hatcher is a matchup Brooklyn really likes.
While focusing on slowing down Gordie Howe is understandable, leaving Ted Lindsay (probably the 2nd best offensive player in this series, unless you place an extremely high emphasis on either Yzerman's single season peak or Lindros' per-game pace) to run rampant against the likes of Svehla, Egan, and Kevin Hatcher is a matchup Brooklyn really likes.
tabness
be a playa
- Apr 4, 2014
- 2,006
- 3,540
I certainly didn't forget about the other two guys on the Production Line. After all, the Potvin • Quackenbush pairing at home is for the entire line. However, I think things are less of an issue on the right than the left. While Lindsay is certainly a great in his own right (same Abel), he has strong scoring before Gordie became the best ever in the fifties, Gordie Howe obviously was the guy of that line.
Potvin and Quackenbush also bring quite a bit of offense from the backend.
I do of course have right wingers Kurri and Larmer. They are top notch two way wingers of their time, and while Lindsay was tough as hell, he wasn't nearly as strong as Howe, I'm just less worried about the matchups here.
Interesting that you think Lindsay is probably the second best offensive player here, is this due to VsX/scoring placements? I just can't agree.
Even going with the VsX approach, I'd certainly argue that the benchmarks Yzerman faced were stiffer than those Lindsay did. Furthermore, Lindsay did what he did playing with Abel and later Howe, not to mention defenseman like Quackenbush, Kelly, and Stewart. Here are his points together as compared to Yzerman's. I think the massive difference in linemates and help on the backend during their best years is self evident. This is not to mention that Yzerman had contextual factors that saw him score less on the powerplay than most stars (the Wings got less powerplays for the first part of his best offensive years, when they started getting more, he wasn't playing nearly as much on the powerplay as other stars, and Fedorov and Yzerman were generally not playing the powerplay together), and of course the home/road splits and the reasons for those.
It's worth bringing up that we have Detroit sports writers that watched the Wings during the forties and fifties like George Puscas, Bruce Martyn, and Joe Falls (some of these even straight up covered the team at the time) who were already saying Yzerman had surpassed the Sawchuks, Lindsays, Kellys, Abels, Delvecchios, and so on by the late eighties. The actual question they asked themselves was if he was better than Howe himself (Puscas, the most restrained in his excitement, simply said to wait until Yzerman's career was over to answer that).
With regards to Egan, while I certainly took him for the big shot and big hits, from what I've read, it seems like he was a solid all around guy, that is what Joe Pelletier's site says. He was regarded well enough to be traded for Hollett after all (and he didn't match Hollett offensively). He's again, one of those guys who played on a weaker team and was relied on more than he probably should have been. He won't have that issue here.
For Svehla, well I'm just not getting the questioning of his defensive prowess here at all. We likely have all seen him play a bit, we know how he played against guys like Lindros. I'll just quote Hockey Scouting Report for him:
"Svehla is among the best in the NHL at the lost art of the sweep-check. If he does lose control of the puck, and an attacker has a step or two on him on a breakaway, he has the poise to dive and use his stick to knock the puck away without touching the man's skates.
He is a terrific skater. No one, not even Jaromir Jagr, can beat Svehla wide, because he skates well backwards and laterally."
Won't argue too much on Hatcher. At his best, he was a beast of course, but the Production Line is going to make you pay for even a small mistake, not to mention a Hatcher sized mistake lol. That being said, Hatcher's on this team to play special teams more than anything, Egan and Svehla are the bigger even strength guys.
All in all, I just feel that of all teams in this thing, I got one of the best lineups to handle the Production Line matchup, and built the team with depth in mind to win the other matchups.
Potvin and Quackenbush also bring quite a bit of offense from the backend.
I do of course have right wingers Kurri and Larmer. They are top notch two way wingers of their time, and while Lindsay was tough as hell, he wasn't nearly as strong as Howe, I'm just less worried about the matchups here.
Interesting that you think Lindsay is probably the second best offensive player here, is this due to VsX/scoring placements? I just can't agree.
Even going with the VsX approach, I'd certainly argue that the benchmarks Yzerman faced were stiffer than those Lindsay did. Furthermore, Lindsay did what he did playing with Abel and later Howe, not to mention defenseman like Quackenbush, Kelly, and Stewart. Here are his points together as compared to Yzerman's. I think the massive difference in linemates and help on the backend during their best years is self evident. This is not to mention that Yzerman had contextual factors that saw him score less on the powerplay than most stars (the Wings got less powerplays for the first part of his best offensive years, when they started getting more, he wasn't playing nearly as much on the powerplay as other stars, and Fedorov and Yzerman were generally not playing the powerplay together), and of course the home/road splits and the reasons for those.
Code:
player name:
ted lindsay
start season:
1945
end season:
1965
1945 21 total
joe carveth 6 28.57% 4ev 2pp 0sh
flash hollett 4 19.05% 2ev 2pp 0sh
mud bruneteau 4 19.05% 3ev 1pp 0sh
murray armstrong 4 19.05% 4ev 0pp 0sh
syd howe 4 19.05% 3ev 1pp 0sh
bill quackenbush 2 9.52% 2ev 0pp 0sh
eddie bruneteau 2 9.52% 2ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 2 9.52% 2ev 0pp 0sh
don grosso 1 4.76% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1946 17 total
fern gauthier 5 29.41% 5ev 0pp 0sh
bill quackenbush 3 17.65% 3ev 0pp 0sh
syd howe 3 17.65% 3ev 0pp 0sh
carl liscombe 2 11.76% 2ev 0pp 0sh
flash hollett 2 11.76% 1ev 1pp 0sh
harold jackson 2 11.76% 2ev 0pp 0sh
joe carveth 2 11.76% 2ev 0pp 0sh
murray armstrong 2 11.76% 1ev 1pp 0sh
adam brown 1 5.88% 1ev 0pp 0sh
eddie bruneteau 1 5.88% 1ev 0pp 0sh
gerry couture 1 5.88% 1ev 0pp 0sh
jack stewart 1 5.88% 1ev 0pp 0sh
jimmy conacher 1 5.88% 1ev 0pp 0sh
mud bruneteau 1 5.88% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1947 42 total
sid abel 12 28.57% 11ev 1pp 0sh
gordie howe 10 23.81% 10ev 0pp 0sh
billy taylor sr. 6 14.29% 3ev 3pp 0sh
bill quackenbush 5 11.9% 5ev 0pp 0sh
pete horeck 5 11.9% 5ev 0pp 0sh
pat lundy 4 9.52% 3ev 1pp 0sh
roy conacher 4 9.52% 1ev 3pp 0sh
unassisted 3 7.14% 1ev 1pp 1sh
doug mccaig 2 4.76% 2ev 0pp 0sh
eddie bruneteau 2 4.76% 1ev 1pp 0sh
harold jackson 2 4.76% 2ev 0pp 0sh
jack stewart 2 4.76% 2ev 0pp 0sh
jimmy conacher 2 4.76% 0ev 2pp 0sh
lloyd doran 2 4.76% 2ev 0pp 0sh
adam brown 1 2.38% 0ev 1pp 0sh
fern gauthier 1 2.38% 1ev 0pp 0sh
gerry couture 1 2.38% 1ev 0pp 0sh
leo reise jr. 1 2.38% 1ev 0pp 0sh
les douglas 1 2.38% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1948 52 total
sid abel 28 53.85% 22ev 6pp 0sh
gordie howe 23 44.23% 19ev 3pp 1sh
jack stewart 6 11.54% 4ev 2pp 0sh
bill quackenbush 4 7.69% 4ev 0pp 0sh
jim mcfadden 4 7.69% 1ev 3pp 0sh
unassisted 4 7.69% 3ev 0pp 1sh
doug mccaig 3 5.77% 3ev 0pp 0sh
red kelly 3 5.77% 1ev 0pp 2sh
bep guidolin 2 3.85% 0ev 2pp 0sh
fern gauthier 2 3.85% 1ev 0pp 1sh
eddie bruneteau 1 1.92% 1ev 0pp 0sh
gerry couture 1 1.92% 0ev 1pp 0sh
marty pavelich 1 1.92% 1ev 0pp 0sh
pete horeck 1 1.92% 0ev 1pp 0sh
rod morrison 1 1.92% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1949 54 total
gordie howe 23 42.59% 21ev 2pp 0sh
sid abel 22 40.74% 16ev 6pp 0sh
bill quackenbush 6 11.11% 5ev 1pp 0sh
red kelly 5 9.26% 4ev 1pp 0sh
bud poile 4 7.41% 0ev 4pp 0sh
marty pavelich 4 7.41% 2ev 2pp 0sh
jim mcfadden 3 5.56% 2ev 1pp 0sh
max mcnab 3 5.56% 3ev 0pp 0sh
gerry couture 2 3.7% 1ev 1pp 0sh
pete horeck 2 3.7% 1ev 1pp 0sh
unassisted 2 3.7% 2ev 0pp 0sh
don morrison 1 1.85% 1ev 0pp 0sh
fern gauthier 1 1.85% 0ev 0pp 1sh
jack stewart 1 1.85% 1ev 0pp 0sh
leo reise jr. 1 1.85% 0ev 1pp 0sh
pat lundy 1 1.85% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1950 72 total
gordie howe 37 51.39% 30ev 7pp 0sh
sid abel 37 51.39% 27ev 10pp 0sh
red kelly 14 19.44% 11ev 3pp 0sh
joe carveth 11 15.28% 2ev 9pp 0sh
lee fogolin 5 6.94% 5ev 0pp 0sh
jack stewart 3 4.17% 3ev 0pp 0sh
leo reise jr. 3 4.17% 2ev 1pp 0sh
clare martin 2 2.78% 2ev 0pp 0sh
george gee 2 2.78% 2ev 0pp 0sh
jim mcfadden 2 2.78% 1ev 1pp 0sh
jimmy peters 2 2.78% 2ev 0pp 0sh
marty pavelich 2 2.78% 2ev 0pp 0sh
al dewsbury 1 1.39% 1ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 1 1.39% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1951 57 total
gordie howe 34 59.65% 30ev 4pp 0sh
sid abel 30 52.63% 25ev 4pp 1sh
red kelly 8 14.04% 7ev 1pp 0sh
leo reise jr. 4 7.02% 3ev 1pp 0sh
metro prystai 4 7.02% 3ev 1pp 0sh
jimmy peters 3 5.26% 3ev 0pp 0sh
marcel pronovost 3 5.26% 3ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 3 5.26% 3ev 0pp 0sh
bob goldham 2 3.51% 1ev 0pp 1sh
clare martin 2 3.51% 2ev 0pp 0sh
glen skov 2 3.51% 1ev 1pp 0sh
george gee 1 1.75% 1ev 0pp 0sh
jim mcfadden 1 1.75% 1ev 0pp 0sh
leo gravelle 1 1.75% 1ev 0pp 0sh
lou jankowski 1 1.75% 1ev 0pp 0sh
rags raglan 1 1.75% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1952 66 total
gordie howe 43 65.15% 34ev 9pp 0sh
sid abel 31 46.97% 20ev 11pp 0sh
red kelly 14 21.21% 8ev 5pp 1sh
glen skov 7 10.61% 2ev 5pp 0sh
bob goldham 4 6.06% 3ev 1pp 0sh
fred glover 3 4.55% 1ev 2pp 0sh
leo reise jr. 2 3.03% 2ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 2 3.03% 2ev 0pp 0sh
alex delvecchio 1 1.52% 1ev 0pp 0sh
benny woit 1 1.52% 1ev 0pp 0sh
marcel pronovost 1 1.52% 1ev 0pp 0sh
vic stasiuk 1 1.52% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1953 69 total
gordie howe 47 68.12% 38ev 9pp 0sh
metro prystai 18 26.09% 15ev 3pp 0sh
red kelly 13 18.84% 9ev 4pp 0sh
marty pavelich 8 11.59% 8ev 0pp 0sh
alex delvecchio 7 10.14% 3ev 4pp 0sh
bob goldham 6 8.7% 6ev 0pp 0sh
marcel pronovost 5 7.25% 3ev 2pp 0sh
reg sinclair 5 7.25% 2ev 3pp 0sh
larry wilson 3 4.35% 1ev 2pp 0sh
glen skov 2 2.9% 0ev 2pp 0sh
jim hay 2 2.9% 1ev 1pp 0sh
benny woit 1 1.45% 1ev 0pp 0sh
lou jankowski 1 1.45% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1954 61 total
gordie howe 41 67.21% 24ev 17pp 0sh
dutch reibel 29 47.54% 21ev 8pp 0sh
red kelly 10 16.39% 5ev 5pp 0sh
bill dineen 5 8.2% 1ev 4pp 0sh
bob goldham 5 8.2% 4ev 1pp 0sh
metro prystai 4 6.56% 1ev 3pp 0sh
marcel pronovost 3 4.92% 2ev 1pp 0sh
alex delvecchio 2 3.28% 1ev 1pp 0sh
johnny wilson 2 3.28% 0ev 2pp 0sh
vic stasiuk 2 3.28% 2ev 0pp 0sh
jimmy peters 1 1.64% 0ev 1pp 0sh
keith allen 1 1.64% 1ev 0pp 0sh
marty pavelich 1 1.64% 1ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 1 1.64% 0ev 0pp 1sh
1955 37 total
dutch reibel 15 40.54% 8ev 7pp 0sh
gordie howe 15 40.54% 11ev 4pp 0sh
alex delvecchio 13 35.14% 9ev 4pp 0sh
red kelly 7 18.92% 4ev 3pp 0sh
bob goldham 3 8.11% 3ev 0pp 0sh
vic stasiuk 3 8.11% 2ev 1pp 0sh
benny woit 2 5.41% 2ev 0pp 0sh
marcel pronovost 2 5.41% 2ev 0pp 0sh
jim hay 1 2.7% 0ev 1pp 0sh
unassisted 1 2.7% 0ev 1pp 0sh
1956 50 total
gordie howe 30 60% 11ev 19pp 0sh
dutch reibel 19 38% 10ev 9pp 0sh
alex delvecchio 11 22% 4ev 7pp 0sh
red kelly 11 22% 2ev 9pp 0sh
bob goldham 5 10% 5ev 0pp 0sh
bill dineen 2 4% 2ev 0pp 0sh
marcel pronovost 2 4% 1ev 1pp 0sh
norm ullman 2 4% 2ev 0pp 0sh
lorne ferguson 1 2% 1ev 0pp 0sh
metro prystai 1 2% 1ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 1 2% 1ev 0pp 0sh
warren godfrey 1 2% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1957 85 total
gordie howe 63 74.12% 45ev 17pp 1sh
norm ullman 38 44.71% 29ev 9pp 0sh
alex delvecchio 15 17.65% 9ev 6pp 0sh
red kelly 8 9.41% 3ev 5pp 0sh
dutch reibel 7 8.24% 2ev 5pp 0sh
marcel pronovost 6 7.06% 5ev 1pp 0sh
al arbour 3 3.53% 3ev 0pp 0sh
metro prystai 3 3.53% 2ev 1pp 0sh
unassisted 3 3.53% 2ev 1pp 0sh
billy dea 2 2.35% 0ev 2pp 0sh
bill dineen 1 1.18% 0ev 1pp 0sh
larry hillman 1 1.18% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1958 39 total
ed litzenberger 21 53.85% 15ev 6pp 0sh
bobby hull 11 28.21% 6ev 5pp 0sh
dutch reibel 7 17.95% 5ev 2pp 0sh
eric nesterenko 7 17.95% 5ev 2pp 0sh
moose vasko 7 17.95% 2ev 5pp 0sh
pierre pilote 7 17.95% 4ev 3pp 0sh
bill dineen 5 12.82% 5ev 0pp 0sh
jimmy thomson 3 7.69% 3ev 0pp 0sh
ian cushenan 2 5.13% 2ev 0pp 0sh
gus mortson 1 2.56% 0ev 1pp 0sh
1959 58 total
ed litzenberger 45 77.59% 33ev 12pp 0sh
tod sloan 33 56.9% 24ev 9pp 0sh
pierre pilote 14 24.14% 5ev 9pp 0sh
glen skov 3 5.17% 2ev 1pp 0sh
jack evans 3 5.17% 3ev 0pp 0sh
moose vasko 3 5.17% 2ev 1pp 0sh
al arbour 1 1.72% 1ev 0pp 0sh
bobby hull 1 1.72% 1ev 0pp 0sh
danny lewicki 1 1.72% 1ev 0pp 0sh
lorne ferguson 1 1.72% 1ev 0pp 0sh
stan mikita 1 1.72% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1960 25 total
ed litzenberger 9 36% 9ev 0pp 0sh
stan mikita 8 32% 8ev 0pp 0sh
kenny wharram 6 24% 6ev 0pp 0sh
dollard st. laurent 5 20% 5ev 0pp 0sh
tod sloan 5 20% 4ev 1pp 0sh
eric nesterenko 4 16% 3ev 1pp 0sh
al arbour 2 8% 2ev 0pp 0sh
moose vasko 2 8% 2ev 0pp 0sh
bill hay 1 4% 1ev 0pp 0sh
glen skov 1 4% 1ev 0pp 0sh
phil maloney 1 4% 0ev 1pp 0sh
pierre pilote 1 4% 0ev 1pp 0sh
no player ted lindsay in season 1961
no player ted lindsay in season 1962
no player ted lindsay in season 1963
no player ted lindsay in season 1964
1965 28 total
bruce macgregor 14 50% 13ev 1pp 0sh
eddie joyal 6 21.43% 6ev 0pp 0sh
norm ullman 5 17.86% 4ev 1pp 0sh
pit martin 5 17.86% 3ev 2pp 0sh
val fonteyne 4 14.29% 3ev 1pp 0sh
alex delvecchio 3 10.71% 1ev 2pp 0sh
gordie howe 3 10.71% 2ev 1pp 0sh
floyd smith 2 7.14% 1ev 1pp 0sh
gary bergman 2 7.14% 2ev 0pp 0sh
marcel pronovost 2 7.14% 2ev 0pp 0sh
bill gadsby 1 3.57% 1ev 0pp 0sh
lowell macdonald 1 3.57% 1ev 0pp 0sh
paul henderson 1 3.57% 1ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 1 3.57% 1ev 0pp 0sh
Code:
player name:
steve yzerman
start season:
1984
end season:
2006
1984 87 total
ron duguay 35 40.23% 21ev 14pp 0sh
john ogrodnick 27 31.03% 18ev 9pp 0sh
ivan boldirev 25 28.74% 15ev 10pp 0sh
brad park 20 22.99% 8ev 12pp 0sh
reed larson 18 20.69% 8ev 10pp 0sh
eddie johnstone 7 8.05% 5ev 2pp 0sh
greg smith 5 5.75% 5ev 0pp 0sh
danny gare 4 4.6% 3ev 1pp 0sh
lane lambert 4 4.6% 4ev 0pp 0sh
randy ladouceur 4 4.6% 4ev 0pp 0sh
kelly kisio 2 2.3% 1ev 1pp 0sh
bob manno 1 1.15% 1ev 0pp 0sh
eddie mio 1 1.15% 0ev 1pp 0sh
john barrett 1 1.15% 1ev 0pp 0sh
paul woods 1 1.15% 1ev 0pp 0sh
rick macleish 1 1.15% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1985 88 total
john ogrodnick 43 48.86% 27ev 16pp 0sh
ron duguay 41 46.59% 29ev 12pp 0sh
reed larson 19 21.59% 9ev 10pp 0sh
ivan boldirev 12 13.64% 2ev 10pp 0sh
brad park 8 9.09% 3ev 5pp 0sh
darryl sittler 5 5.68% 3ev 2pp 0sh
greg smith 5 5.68% 5ev 0pp 0sh
lane lambert 5 5.68% 5ev 0pp 0sh
randy ladouceur 5 5.68% 4ev 1pp 0sh
john barrett 4 4.55% 4ev 0pp 0sh
danny gare 3 3.41% 1ev 2pp 0sh
frantisek cernik 2 2.27% 2ev 0pp 0sh
kelly kisio 2 2.27% 0ev 2pp 0sh
larry trader 2 2.27% 1ev 1pp 0sh
unassisted 2 2.27% 2ev 0pp 0sh
bob manno 1 1.14% 1ev 0pp 0sh
brad smith 1 1.14% 1ev 0pp 0sh
colin campbell 1 1.14% 1ev 0pp 0sh
corrado micalef 1 1.14% 1ev 0pp 0sh
milan chalupa 1 1.14% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1986 39 total
john ogrodnick 12 30.77% 3ev 9pp 0sh
petr klima 11 28.21% 7ev 4pp 0sh
reed larson 8 20.51% 3ev 5pp 0sh
warren young 6 15.38% 3ev 3pp 0sh
christopher cichocki 5 12.82% 4ev 1pp 0sh
danny gare 5 12.82% 4ev 1pp 0sh
joey kocur 5 12.82% 4ev 1pp 0sh
randy ladouceur 4 10.26% 4ev 0pp 0sh
ron duguay 4 10.26% 2ev 2pp 0sh
greg smith 2 5.13% 1ev 1pp 0sh
kelly kisio 2 5.13% 0ev 2pp 0sh
mike mcewen 2 5.13% 1ev 1pp 0sh
unassisted 2 5.13% 2ev 0pp 0sh
bob probert 1 2.56% 1ev 0pp 0sh
john barrett 1 2.56% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1987 86 total
gerard gallant 29 33.72% 15ev 14pp 0sh
john ogrodnick 23 26.74% 14ev 8pp 1sh
darren veitch 20 23.26% 12ev 8pp 0sh
dave barr 13 15.12% 9ev 4pp 0sh
doug shedden 9 10.47% 7ev 2pp 0sh
lee norwood 9 10.47% 4ev 4pp 1sh
mike o'connell 9 10.47% 4ev 5pp 0sh
bob probert 7 8.14% 5ev 2pp 0sh
brent ashton 7 8.14% 2ev 5pp 0sh
petr klima 5 5.81% 2ev 3pp 0sh
joey kocur 4 4.65% 1ev 3pp 0sh
gilbert delorme 3 3.49% 3ev 0pp 0sh
randy ladouceur 3 3.49% 2ev 1pp 0sh
dave lewis 2 2.33% 2ev 0pp 0sh
steve chiasson 2 2.33% 1ev 1pp 0sh
unassisted 2 2.33% 1ev 0pp 1sh
adam oates 1 1.16% 0ev 1pp 0sh
doug halward 1 1.16% 1ev 0pp 0sh
greg stefan 1 1.16% 1ev 0pp 0sh
harold snepsts 1 1.16% 1ev 0pp 0sh
mel bridgman 1 1.16% 1ev 0pp 0sh
ric seiling 1 1.16% 1ev 0pp 0sh
rick zombo 1 1.16% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1988 98 total
gerard gallant 38 38.78% 25ev 13pp 0sh
bob probert 34 34.69% 20ev 14pp 0sh
darren veitch 19 19.39% 7ev 10pp 2sh
petr klima 14 14.29% 12ev 2pp 0sh
doug halward 13 13.27% 4ev 8pp 1sh
jeff sharples 12 12.24% 4ev 8pp 0sh
lee norwood 9 9.18% 4ev 4pp 1sh
mike o'connell 5 5.1% 3ev 1pp 1sh
joe murphy 4 4.08% 2ev 2pp 0sh
mel bridgman 4 4.08% 4ev 0pp 0sh
brent ashton 3 3.06% 2ev 0pp 1sh
shawn burr 3 3.06% 1ev 1pp 1sh
harold snepsts 2 2.04% 2ev 0pp 0sh
steve chiasson 2 2.04% 1ev 1pp 0sh
adam oates 1 1.02% 0ev 1pp 0sh
brent fedyk 1 1.02% 1ev 0pp 0sh
dave barr 1 1.02% 0ev 0pp 1sh
rick zombo 1 1.02% 1ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 1 1.02% 0ev 0pp 1sh
1989 152 total
gerard gallant 62 40.79% 41ev 21pp 0sh
paul maclean 53 34.87% 40ev 13pp 0sh
steve chiasson 29 19.08% 17ev 10pp 2sh
lee norwood 20 13.16% 10ev 9pp 1sh
adam oates 15 9.87% 1ev 14pp 0sh
dave barr 13 8.55% 8ev 3pp 2sh
jeff sharples 8 5.26% 5ev 3pp 0sh
doug houda 7 4.61% 7ev 0pp 0sh
rick zombo 7 4.61% 4ev 2pp 1sh
shawn burr 7 4.61% 6ev 1pp 0sh
james nill 6 3.95% 6ev 0pp 0sh
mike o'connell 4 2.63% 3ev 1pp 0sh
miroslav frycer 4 2.63% 3ev 1pp 0sh
unassisted 4 2.63% 3ev 1pp 0sh
adam graves 3 1.97% 3ev 0pp 0sh
jim pavese 3 1.97% 3ev 0pp 0sh
gilbert delorme 2 1.32% 2ev 0pp 0sh
joe murphy 2 1.32% 1ev 1pp 0sh
joey kocur 2 1.32% 0ev 2pp 0sh
john chabot 2 1.32% 0ev 0pp 2sh
petr klima 2 1.32% 1ev 1pp 0sh
tim higgins 2 1.32% 2ev 0pp 0sh
bob probert 1 0.66% 0ev 1pp 0sh
brent fedyk 1 0.66% 1ev 0pp 0sh
dale krentz 1 0.66% 0ev 1pp 0sh
glen hanlon 1 0.66% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1990 124 total
gerard gallant 47 37.9% 31ev 15pp 1sh
steve chiasson 21 16.94% 12ev 9pp 0sh
joey kocur 20 16.13% 18ev 2pp 0sh
shawn burr 14 11.29% 9ev 3pp 2sh
bernie federko 13 10.48% 1ev 12pp 0sh
john chabot 13 10.48% 4ev 6pp 3sh
dave barr 12 9.68% 7ev 3pp 2sh
unassisted 9 7.26% 8ev 0pp 1sh
rick zombo 8 6.45% 6ev 2pp 0sh
borje salming 7 5.65% 1ev 5pp 1sh
jimmy carson 7 5.65% 0ev 7pp 0sh
mike o'connell 6 4.84% 4ev 1pp 1sh
yves racine 6 4.84% 5ev 1pp 0sh
lee norwood 5 4.03% 2ev 1pp 2sh
sheldon kennedy 4 3.23% 2ev 2pp 0sh
daniel shank 3 2.42% 3ev 0pp 0sh
doug houda 3 2.42% 3ev 0pp 0sh
randy mckay 3 2.42% 3ev 0pp 0sh
greg adams 2 1.61% 2ev 0pp 0sh
marc habscheid 2 1.61% 2ev 0pp 0sh
robert picard 2 1.61% 1ev 0pp 1sh
adam graves 1 0.81% 1ev 0pp 0sh
brent fedyk 1 0.81% 1ev 0pp 0sh
dean morton 1 0.81% 1ev 0pp 0sh
glen hanlon 1 0.81% 1ev 0pp 0sh
joe murphy 1 0.81% 1ev 0pp 0sh
john mokosak 1 0.81% 1ev 0pp 0sh
kevin mcclelland 1 0.81% 1ev 0pp 0sh
petr klima 1 0.81% 0ev 1pp 0sh
1991 106 total
yves racine 27 25.47% 12ev 14pp 1sh
sergei fedorov 25 23.58% 5ev 20pp 0sh
gerard gallant 18 16.98% 12ev 6pp 0sh
paul ysebaert 17 16.04% 14ev 3pp 0sh
dave barr 16 15.09% 14ev 0pp 2sh
johan garpenlov 9 8.49% 8ev 1pp 0sh
shawn burr 9 8.49% 7ev 2pp 0sh
jimmy carson 6 5.66% 0ev 6pp 0sh
per djoos 6 5.66% 3ev 3pp 0sh
steve chiasson 6 5.66% 3ev 3pp 0sh
bob probert 5 4.72% 2ev 3pp 0sh
brad mccrimmon 5 4.72% 3ev 0pp 2sh
rick green 5 4.72% 4ev 0pp 1sh
rick zombo 5 4.72% 4ev 0pp 1sh
joey kocur 4 3.77% 4ev 0pp 0sh
brent fedyk 3 2.83% 3ev 0pp 0sh
keith primeau 3 2.83% 3ev 0pp 0sh
lee norwood 3 2.83% 3ev 0pp 0sh
marc habscheid 3 2.83% 1ev 1pp 1sh
bobby dollas 2 1.89% 2ev 0pp 0sh
brad marsh 2 1.89% 1ev 0pp 1sh
randy mckay 2 1.89% 2ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 2 1.89% 1ev 0pp 1sh
chris luongo 1 0.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
doug crossman 1 0.94% 0ev 1pp 0sh
doug houda 1 0.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
gary shuchuk 1 0.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
john chabot 1 0.94% 0ev 1pp 0sh
kevin miller 1 0.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
mike sillinger 1 0.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
tim cheveldae 1 0.94% 0ev 1pp 0sh
1992 101 total
nicklas lidstrom 19 18.81% 7ev 11pp 1sh
sergei fedorov 16 15.84% 5ev 10pp 1sh
gerard gallant 15 14.85% 13ev 2pp 0sh
ray sheppard 15 14.85% 12ev 3pp 0sh
bob probert 13 12.87% 10ev 3pp 0sh
kevin miller 12 11.88% 9ev 1pp 2sh
steve chiasson 12 11.88% 5ev 6pp 1sh
paul ysebaert 11 10.89% 7ev 3pp 1sh
brad mccrimmon 8 7.92% 3ev 4pp 1sh
unassisted 8 7.92% 5ev 1pp 2sh
vladimir konstantinov 8 7.92% 6ev 0pp 2sh
yves racine 8 7.92% 4ev 2pp 2sh
keith primeau 5 4.95% 5ev 0pp 0sh
alan kerr 4 3.96% 4ev 0pp 0sh
brent fedyk 4 3.96% 4ev 0pp 0sh
shawn burr 4 3.96% 3ev 0pp 1sh
jimmy carson 3 2.97% 0ev 3pp 0sh
bobby dollas 2 1.98% 2ev 0pp 0sh
brad marsh 2 1.98% 2ev 0pp 0sh
sheldon kennedy 2 1.98% 2ev 0pp 0sh
tim cheveldae 2 1.98% 2ev 0pp 0sh
brian maclellan 1 0.99% 1ev 0pp 0sh
doug crossman 1 0.99% 1ev 0pp 0sh
johan garpenlov 1 0.99% 1ev 0pp 0sh
martin lapointe 1 0.99% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1993 130 total
dino ciccarelli 49 37.69% 37ev 12pp 0sh
gerard gallant 20 15.38% 20ev 0pp 0sh
paul ysebaert 19 14.62% 13ev 5pp 1sh
ray sheppard 18 13.85% 9ev 9pp 0sh
bob probert 17 13.08% 9ev 8pp 0sh
paul coffey 15 11.54% 6ev 9pp 0sh
yves racine 14 10.77% 11ev 3pp 0sh
steve chiasson 13 10% 5ev 7pp 1sh
shawn burr 12 9.23% 6ev 0pp 6sh
sergei fedorov 10 7.69% 6ev 3pp 1sh
mark howe 9 6.92% 4ev 5pp 0sh
nicklas lidstrom 8 6.15% 6ev 1pp 1sh
keith primeau 6 4.62% 0ev 5pp 1sh
sheldon kennedy 5 3.85% 5ev 0pp 0sh
vladimir konstantinov 5 3.85% 5ev 0pp 0sh
john ogrodnick 4 3.08% 0ev 4pp 0sh
unassisted 4 3.08% 4ev 0pp 0sh
tim cheveldae 2 1.54% 0ev 0pp 2sh
brad mccrimmon 1 0.77% 0ev 1pp 0sh
chris tancill 1 0.77% 1ev 0pp 0sh
dennis vial 1 0.77% 1ev 0pp 0sh
jimmy carson 1 0.77% 0ev 1pp 0sh
mike sillinger 1 0.77% 1ev 0pp 0sh
steve konroyd 1 0.77% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1994 81 total
ray sheppard 40 49.38% 25ev 14pp 1sh
keith primeau 27 33.33% 20ev 5pp 2sh
paul coffey 22 27.16% 9ev 11pp 2sh
sergei fedorov 14 17.28% 7ev 5pp 2sh
nicklas lidstrom 10 12.35% 6ev 4pp 0sh
steve chiasson 9 11.11% 3ev 4pp 2sh
dino ciccarelli 7 8.64% 6ev 1pp 0sh
vladimir konstantinov 7 8.64% 6ev 0pp 1sh
mark howe 4 4.94% 2ev 2pp 0sh
dallas drake 3 3.7% 3ev 0pp 0sh
jason york 2 2.47% 1ev 1pp 0sh
martin lapointe 2 2.47% 2ev 0pp 0sh
mike sillinger 2 2.47% 2ev 0pp 0sh
bob essensa 1 1.23% 1ev 0pp 0sh
bob halkidis 1 1.23% 1ev 0pp 0sh
darren mccarty 1 1.23% 1ev 0pp 0sh
shawn burr 1 1.23% 1ev 0pp 0sh
terry carkner 1 1.23% 1ev 0pp 0sh
vyacheslav kozlov 1 1.23% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1995 36 total
paul coffey 14 38.89% 6ev 8pp 0sh
dino ciccarelli 12 33.33% 3ev 9pp 0sh
sergei fedorov 12 33.33% 4ev 8pp 0sh
ray sheppard 9 25% 5ev 4pp 0sh
bob errey 8 22.22% 5ev 3pp 0sh
mike sillinger 3 8.33% 2ev 1pp 0sh
nicklas lidstrom 3 8.33% 1ev 2pp 0sh
keith primeau 2 5.56% 1ev 1pp 0sh
viacheslav fetisov 2 5.56% 2ev 0pp 0sh
vyacheslav kozlov 2 5.56% 0ev 2pp 0sh
doug brown 1 2.78% 1ev 0pp 0sh
martin lapointe 1 2.78% 1ev 0pp 0sh
terry carkner 1 2.78% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1996 95 total
nicklas lidstrom 27 28.42% 6ev 17pp 4sh
bob errey 22 23.16% 17ev 3pp 2sh
paul coffey 22 23.16% 11ev 11pp 0sh
dino ciccarelli 21 22.11% 10ev 11pp 0sh
sergei fedorov 18 18.95% 6ev 11pp 1sh
keith primeau 10 10.53% 3ev 6pp 1sh
darren mccarty 7 7.37% 7ev 0pp 0sh
igor larionov 7 7.37% 2ev 5pp 0sh
greg johnson 6 6.32% 1ev 4pp 1sh
tim taylor 6 6.32% 6ev 0pp 0sh
viacheslav fetisov 6 6.32% 4ev 1pp 1sh
vladimir konstantinov 5 5.26% 3ev 2pp 0sh
mathieu dandenault 4 4.21% 3ev 1pp 0sh
unassisted 3 3.16% 2ev 0pp 1sh
bob rouse 2 2.11% 2ev 0pp 0sh
marc bergevin 2 2.11% 1ev 0pp 1sh
ray sheppard 2 2.11% 0ev 2pp 0sh
vyacheslav kozlov 2 2.11% 1ev 1pp 0sh
doug brown 1 1.05% 1ev 0pp 0sh
kris draper 1 1.05% 1ev 0pp 0sh
martin lapointe 1 1.05% 1ev 0pp 0sh
mike ramsey 1 1.05% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1997 82 total
brendan shanahan 33 40.24% 20ev 12pp 1sh
nicklas lidstrom 18 21.95% 11ev 7pp 0sh
darren mccarty 16 19.51% 14ev 2pp 0sh
sergei fedorov 14 17.07% 8ev 6pp 0sh
tomas sandstrom 12 14.63% 10ev 2pp 0sh
martin lapointe 10 12.2% 6ev 4pp 0sh
igor larionov 8 9.76% 2ev 6pp 0sh
vyacheslav kozlov 7 8.54% 4ev 3pp 0sh
greg johnson 6 7.32% 5ev 1pp 0sh
vladimir konstantinov 6 7.32% 6ev 0pp 0sh
jamie pushor 4 4.88% 4ev 0pp 0sh
larry murphy 4 4.88% 2ev 2pp 0sh
mathieu dandenault 4 4.88% 4ev 0pp 0sh
bob rouse 2 2.44% 1ev 0pp 1sh
tomas holmstrom 2 2.44% 0ev 2pp 0sh
aaron ward 1 1.22% 1ev 0pp 0sh
bob errey 1 1.22% 1ev 0pp 0sh
kirk maltby 1 1.22% 1ev 0pp 0sh
viacheslav fetisov 1 1.22% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1998 69 total
nicklas lidstrom 20 28.99% 4ev 16pp 0sh
darren mccarty 17 24.64% 11ev 6pp 0sh
brendan shanahan 15 21.74% 5ev 10pp 0sh
larry murphy 14 20.29% 8ev 5pp 1sh
igor larionov 8 11.59% 4ev 4pp 0sh
anders eriksson 7 10.14% 5ev 2pp 0sh
vyacheslav kozlov 7 10.14% 4ev 3pp 0sh
tomas holmstrom 6 8.7% 6ev 0pp 0sh
brent gilchrist 5 7.25% 5ev 0pp 0sh
kirk maltby 5 7.25% 4ev 0pp 1sh
sergei fedorov 5 7.25% 3ev 2pp 0sh
doug brown 3 4.35% 1ev 2pp 0sh
kris draper 3 4.35% 2ev 1pp 0sh
martin lapointe 3 4.35% 2ev 1pp 0sh
viacheslav fetisov 3 4.35% 2ev 1pp 0sh
bob rouse 2 2.9% 2ev 0pp 0sh
dmitri mironov 2 2.9% 2ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 2 2.9% 1ev 0pp 1sh
jamie pushor 1 1.45% 1ev 0pp 0sh
mike knuble 1 1.45% 1ev 0pp 0sh
1999 71 total
darren mccarty 22 30.99% 17ev 4pp 1sh
nicklas lidstrom 21 29.58% 8ev 13pp 0sh
brendan shanahan 16 22.54% 13ev 2pp 1sh
sergei fedorov 14 19.72% 9ev 5pp 0sh
larry murphy 10 14.08% 4ev 4pp 2sh
igor larionov 9 12.68% 5ev 4pp 0sh
vyacheslav kozlov 9 12.68% 6ev 3pp 0sh
tomas holmstrom 7 9.86% 4ev 3pp 0sh
jamie macoun 3 4.23% 3ev 0pp 0sh
uwe krupp 3 4.23% 2ev 1pp 0sh
anders eriksson 2 2.82% 2ev 0pp 0sh
chris chelios 2 2.82% 0ev 2pp 0sh
kirk maltby 2 2.82% 1ev 1pp 0sh
martin lapointe 2 2.82% 1ev 1pp 0sh
unassisted 2 2.82% 1ev 0pp 1sh
aaron ward 1 1.41% 1ev 0pp 0sh
chris osgood 1 1.41% 0ev 1pp 0sh
kris draper 1 1.41% 1ev 0pp 0sh
stacy roest 1 1.41% 0ev 1pp 0sh
todd gill 1 1.41% 1ev 0pp 0sh
wendel clark 1 1.41% 1ev 0pp 0sh
2000 79 total
brendan shanahan 26 32.91% 14ev 11pp 1sh
pat verbeek 23 29.11% 18ev 5pp 0sh
nicklas lidstrom 18 22.78% 7ev 11pp 0sh
steve duchesne 12 15.19% 6ev 6pp 0sh
chris chelios 10 12.66% 7ev 3pp 0sh
larry murphy 10 12.66% 6ev 4pp 0sh
sergei fedorov 10 12.66% 2ev 6pp 2sh
tomas holmstrom 6 7.59% 2ev 4pp 0sh
vyacheslav kozlov 5 6.33% 4ev 1pp 0sh
darren mccarty 4 5.06% 4ev 0pp 0sh
igor larionov 4 5.06% 0ev 4pp 0sh
unassisted 4 5.06% 2ev 1pp 1sh
mathieu dandenault 3 3.8% 3ev 0pp 0sh
stacy roest 2 2.53% 2ev 0pp 0sh
aaron ward 1 1.27% 1ev 0pp 0sh
chris osgood 1 1.27% 0ev 0pp 1sh
darryl laplante 1 1.27% 1ev 0pp 0sh
jiri fischer 1 1.27% 1ev 0pp 0sh
ken wregget 1 1.27% 0ev 0pp 1sh
kris draper 1 1.27% 1ev 0pp 0sh
yan golubovsky 1 1.27% 1ev 0pp 0sh
2001 52 total
brendan shanahan 18 34.62% 9ev 9pp 0sh
nicklas lidstrom 13 25% 5ev 8pp 0sh
igor larionov 9 17.31% 5ev 4pp 0sh
martin lapointe 9 17.31% 5ev 4pp 0sh
sergei fedorov 7 13.46% 0ev 7pp 0sh
steve duchesne 6 11.54% 4ev 2pp 0sh
larry murphy 5 9.62% 5ev 0pp 0sh
tomas holmstrom 5 9.62% 2ev 3pp 0sh
darren mccarty 4 7.69% 3ev 0pp 1sh
pat verbeek 4 7.69% 3ev 1pp 0sh
boyd devereaux 2 3.85% 2ev 0pp 0sh
kris draper 2 3.85% 2ev 0pp 0sh
mathieu dandenault 2 3.85% 2ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 2 3.85% 2ev 0pp 0sh
vyacheslav kozlov 2 3.85% 2ev 0pp 0sh
aaron ward 1 1.92% 1ev 0pp 0sh
doug brown 1 1.92% 1ev 0pp 0sh
maxim kuznetsov 1 1.92% 1ev 0pp 0sh
todd gill 1 1.92% 1ev 0pp 0sh
2002 48 total
brett hull 18 37.5% 10ev 7pp 1sh
brendan shanahan 10 20.83% 4ev 6pp 0sh
luc robitaille 8 16.67% 3ev 5pp 0sh
nicklas lidstrom 8 16.67% 1ev 7pp 0sh
sergei fedorov 7 14.58% 1ev 6pp 0sh
chris chelios 5 10.42% 3ev 1pp 1sh
igor larionov 5 10.42% 2ev 3pp 0sh
boyd devereaux 4 8.33% 4ev 0pp 0sh
mathieu dandenault 4 8.33% 3ev 1pp 0sh
tomas holmstrom 4 8.33% 1ev 3pp 0sh
kirk maltby 3 6.25% 3ev 0pp 0sh
darren mccarty 2 4.17% 2ev 0pp 0sh
fredrik olausson 2 4.17% 2ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 2 4.17% 1ev 0pp 1sh
brent gilchrist 1 2.08% 1ev 0pp 0sh
kris draper 1 2.08% 1ev 0pp 0sh
2003 8 total
sergei fedorov 5 62.5% 4ev 1pp 0sh
brendan shanahan 2 25% 2ev 0pp 0sh
pavel datsyuk 2 25% 0ev 2pp 0sh
dmitri bykov 1 12.5% 0ev 1pp 0sh
henrik zetterberg 1 12.5% 1ev 0pp 0sh
jason woolley 1 12.5% 1ev 0pp 0sh
mathieu schneider 1 12.5% 0ev 1pp 0sh
nicklas lidstrom 1 12.5% 1ev 0pp 0sh
patrick boileau 1 12.5% 1ev 0pp 0sh
tomas holmstrom 1 12.5% 0ev 1pp 0sh
2004 49 total
brendan shanahan 19 38.78% 6ev 13pp 0sh
nicklas lidstrom 13 26.53% 5ev 7pp 1sh
kris draper 9 18.37% 7ev 2pp 0sh
ray whitney 8 16.33% 8ev 0pp 0sh
mathieu schneider 7 14.29% 1ev 6pp 0sh
tomas holmstrom 7 14.29% 1ev 6pp 0sh
jason williams 4 8.16% 4ev 0pp 0sh
boyd devereaux 3 6.12% 3ev 0pp 0sh
chris chelios 3 6.12% 3ev 0pp 0sh
henrik zetterberg 3 6.12% 3ev 0pp 0sh
jiri fischer 3 6.12% 3ev 0pp 0sh
kirk maltby 3 6.12% 2ev 0pp 1sh
robert lang 2 4.08% 1ev 1pp 0sh
anders myrvold 1 2.04% 1ev 0pp 0sh
brett hull 1 2.04% 1ev 0pp 0sh
derian hatcher 1 2.04% 0ev 1pp 0sh
jamie rivers 1 2.04% 1ev 0pp 0sh
jason woolley 1 2.04% 1ev 0pp 0sh
2006 34 total
robert lang 15 44.12% 11ev 4pp 0sh
jason williams 10 29.41% 8ev 2pp 0sh
mathieu schneider 7 20.59% 4ev 3pp 0sh
nicklas lidstrom 7 20.59% 2ev 5pp 0sh
brendan shanahan 6 17.65% 1ev 5pp 0sh
kirk maltby 3 8.82% 3ev 0pp 0sh
kris draper 3 8.82% 3ev 0pp 0sh
daniel cleary 2 5.88% 2ev 0pp 0sh
jason woolley 2 5.88% 1ev 1pp 0sh
tomas holmstrom 2 5.88% 1ev 1pp 0sh
andreas lilja 1 2.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
chris chelios 1 2.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
henrik zetterberg 1 2.94% 0ev 1pp 0sh
johan franzen 1 2.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
mikael samuelsson 1 2.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
niklas kronwall 1 2.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
pavel datsyuk 1 2.94% 1ev 0pp 0sh
unassisted 1 2.94% 1ev 0pp 0shIt's worth bringing up that we have Detroit sports writers that watched the Wings during the forties and fifties like George Puscas, Bruce Martyn, and Joe Falls (some of these even straight up covered the team at the time) who were already saying Yzerman had surpassed the Sawchuks, Lindsays, Kellys, Abels, Delvecchios, and so on by the late eighties. The actual question they asked themselves was if he was better than Howe himself (Puscas, the most restrained in his excitement, simply said to wait until Yzerman's career was over to answer that).
With regards to Egan, while I certainly took him for the big shot and big hits, from what I've read, it seems like he was a solid all around guy, that is what Joe Pelletier's site says. He was regarded well enough to be traded for Hollett after all (and he didn't match Hollett offensively). He's again, one of those guys who played on a weaker team and was relied on more than he probably should have been. He won't have that issue here.
For Svehla, well I'm just not getting the questioning of his defensive prowess here at all. We likely have all seen him play a bit, we know how he played against guys like Lindros. I'll just quote Hockey Scouting Report for him:
"Svehla is among the best in the NHL at the lost art of the sweep-check. If he does lose control of the puck, and an attacker has a step or two on him on a breakaway, he has the poise to dive and use his stick to knock the puck away without touching the man's skates.
He is a terrific skater. No one, not even Jaromir Jagr, can beat Svehla wide, because he skates well backwards and laterally."
Won't argue too much on Hatcher. At his best, he was a beast of course, but the Production Line is going to make you pay for even a small mistake, not to mention a Hatcher sized mistake lol. That being said, Hatcher's on this team to play special teams more than anything, Egan and Svehla are the bigger even strength guys.
All in all, I just feel that of all teams in this thing, I got one of the best lineups to handle the Production Line matchup, and built the team with depth in mind to win the other matchups.
Ad
Upcoming events
-
-
-
-
Game 4 Carolina Hurricanes @ New York Islanders - Carolina leads series 3-0Wagers: 6Staked: $3,601.00Event closes- Updated:
-
