That Screaming Cowboy is Jimmy Barnes himself. He'll do anything for a couple bucks these days.
Haha, as I was doing that research, I found out who that was...And that did occur to me: only person here who might know who that is is probably Muppet
That Screaming Cowboy is Jimmy Barnes himself. He'll do anything for a couple bucks these days.
No being a loser is the art of losing but never quite enough to become a winner. See also Coyotes.Mark Cuban is a loser
“I’m probably not supposed to say this, but,...losing is our best option.’”
Amid 2nd disastrous season, Cuban told Mavs: 'Losing is our best option'
Mark Cuban is a loser
“I’m probably not supposed to say this, but,...losing is our best option.’”
Amid 2nd disastrous season, Cuban told Mavs: 'Losing is our best option'
2. Little Miss BBQ – Phoenix
85. Green Corner Restaurant – Mesa
100. Ten Handcrafted American Fare & Spirits – Phoenix
When do the Coyotes get to cash in their good boy points for not tanking?
I think you're confused on what tanking is supposed to achieve.LOL, no surprise that strategy is popular here.
Let's throw some cold water on that, shall we?
Golden State Warriors
Steph Curry - 7th pick
Klay Thompson - 11th pick
Draymond Green - 35th pick
Kevin Durant - 2nd pick...for another team...9 years before he became a GSW
Figures Cuban believes in that rubbish, he seems like the type, and that he has supporters here.
I think you're confused on what tanking is supposed to achieve.
Fair enough, perhaps you're just shortsighted then.Oh I absolutely am not
Winter is quietly roaring back
****ing groundhog.
I froze my ass off on the way home since my heater stopped working.
I'd say he has honor and if all competed with honor, this would not be a discussion and the system would work.Fair enough, perhaps you're just shortsighted then.
Fair enough, perhaps you're just shortsighted then.
Fair enough, perhaps you're just shortsighted then.
I appreciate your idealism but that's not how the world works.I'd say he has honor and if all competed with honor, this would not be a discussion and the system would work.
Typical tanker retort? Others like me? No I'm not being condescending to you so perhaps you could consider not being snotty.And that is the typical tanker retort. I'm used to it. I disagree. (although, to your credit, you lack the condescension of others like you)
Using Buffalo as an example is kind of pointless for now, Jack Eichel is 21, that story is far from written yet. To be clear I'm not talking about just any prospects, I'm talking about super prospects. The McDavid, Eichel, Matthews, Laine and Dahlin types. You tank for Connor McDavid or Auston Matthews, you do not tank for Nico Hischier or Aaron Ekblad. Also to be clear when I'm talking about tanking, I'm talking about teams that already suck. You don't take a middle of the road team and tank it but if you're already crappy and facing the realities of needing a rebuild, you absolutely should tank when a super prospect is available. Not doing so is a fools move IMO.Look at Buffalo. They tanked HARD to get Eichel. And now they have a complete losing culture. Eichel has done nothing to turn their fortunes around.
Prospect players are so overvalued these days. Maybe it's the EA Sports effect. But the process you have to go through to properly tank guts your organization so badly that it could take years to build around the sparkling shiny new star you've drafted - if you ever get good enough before he's either too old, traded away, or signs elsewhere as a UFA.
Disliking and distrusting a tank job is not a function of being shortsighted. If anything, the reverse is true.
Well I can't speak for others but in my case I see that only 1 team in the past 25 years has won the Stanley Cup without a lottery pick (top 3) on their roster. Now I understand correlation does not mean causation but that's a fact that's pretty damn tough to ignore. btw...the only team to not have a top 3 was the 2001 Avs but even that is a bit of an asterisk because they did have the number #1 pick but instead traded it for a boat load of assets that led them to their powerhouse team.^
For me, the suspicion is that some people will look at the Crosby/Malkin Penguins and the Kane/Toews Hawks, and think that's the best if not only way to get there, because that's all they know. But bring up the Oilers (and now maybe Sabres), or any other example in the last 20-30 years where being bad and getting 'can't miss' players didn't work so well, and they stick their fingers in their ears and go "LA LA LA LA LA LA....I cant hear you, you short sighted git...LA LA LA".
Don't forget the context here, this discussion was about when tanking essentially guaranteed your spot in the draft, not merely giving you "a couple of percentage points" extra.It's just not even close for me between going to a game to watch a team that has a chance of winning the game I'm attending, and a gaining a couple of percentage points in a lottery to pick from people who may or may not ever turn into good let alone great NHL players.
I appreciate your idealism but that's not how the world works.
Typical tanker retort? Others like me? No I'm not being condescending to you so perhaps you could consider not being snotty.
Using Buffalo as an example is kind of pointless for now, Jack Eichel is 21, that story is far from written yet. To be clear I'm not talking about just any prospects, I'm talking about super prospects. The McDavid, Eichel, Matthews, Laine and Dahlin types. You tank for Connor McDavid or Auston Matthews, you do not tank for Nico Hischier or Aaron Ekblad. Also to be clear when I'm talking about tanking, I'm talking about teams that already suck. You don't take a middle of the road team and tank it but if you're already crappy and facing the realities of needing a rebuild, you absolutely should tank when a super prospect is available. Not doing so is a fools move IMO.
Well I can't speak for others but in my case I see that only 1 team in the past 25 years has won the Stanley Cup without a lottery pick (top 3) on their roster. Now I understand correlation does not mean causation but that's a fact that's pretty damn tough to ignore. btw...the only team to not have a top 3 was the 2001 Avs but even that is a bit of an asterisk because they did have the number #1 pick but instead traded it for a boat load of assets that led them to their powerhouse team.
Don't forget the context here, this discussion was about when tanking essentially guaranteed your spot in the draft, not merely giving you "a couple of percentage points" extra.
That's because there's a fine line between being honorable and being a fool.Yeah, honor is lacking generally speaking. Oddly enough some twist that into some deranged form of intellect.