Neill99
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2006
- 289
- 28
I hope it stays empty forever. Nothing against KC, but I hate AEG.
I hope it stays empty forever. Nothing against KC, but I hate AEG.
I hope it stays empty forever. Nothing against KC, but I hate AEG.
Fair enough.Missouri doesn't have an NBA team. Let em have basketball...
Well thanks!I don't know why, but every time I see your avatar, I laugh, even now.
I can understand how you're personally offended (assuming you're a Pens fan), but I'd blame AEG before the city. They're all about ripping hearts out and simply used Kansas City as the venue for their latest murder.I hope it stays empty forever. And it is all about KC. They built an arena solely to steal a team, any team, and I have gone through hell for a year. Sue me, I am bitter no matter how this turns out.
Missouri doesn't have an NBA team. Let em have basketball...
I would be shocked if the league does not expand within five years. That is personal opinion though, nothing concrete.
I believe the Pittsburgh Predators will be moving into the bright shiny new rink.
I hope it stays empty forever. And it is all about KC. They built an arena solely to steal a team, any team, and I have gone through hell for a year. Sue me, I am bitter no matter how this turns out.
Missouri doesn't have an NBA team. Let em have basketball...
They built an arena just for a once-a-year college tournament? Man, that's bigtime thinking right there. The NHL should jump all over a backwards city like that.Believe it or not, KC built that arena to keep the Big 12 basketball tournament from moving to Dallas on a permanant basis. In order to keep the arena afloat they need either an NBA or NHL team.
I would. Expansion is not the answer. The league can't sell itself with the teams it already has. Why the hell should they add more???
So what if KC has an empty arena. That is not the NHL's problem.
I would. Expansion is not the answer. The league can't sell itself with the teams it already has. Why the hell should they add more???
So what if KC has an empty arena. That is not the NHL's problem.
I totally agree, for different reasons:
1.) They were dumb enough to build an arena without having a team in place. Who is dumb enough to do that? KC!
2.) In an atrocious (but not unprecedented) move, the people of KC passed a Hotel/Rental Car tax which paid for 80% of the arena. To me, it is UTTERLY PATHETIC to have visitors pay for your arena.
They tried to say that people will be coming there for tournaments and stuff and they should help pay for the arena, but most of the time, it is the KC residents who will be attending events in the arena (games for a new team, WWE, Disney on Ice, etc). They should pay for their own godd**ned arena, not us.
KC had the Kings, but the Kings bolted due to, surprise surprise, poor support. KC doesn't deserve basketball or hockey.
They are a horrible sports town that's only claim to fame in the sports world is support of the Chiefs, but that is all about the bandwagon too.
It must be nice to use a completely different time and era as a reason as to why major, professional sports won't work in KC now. By that logic, Minnesota should have never gotten another team (basketball or hockey) Houston shouldn't have gotten the Texans (NFL), New Orleans shouldn't have the Hornets (NBA) and Colorado shouldn't have the Avalanche. Times change, economical landscapes can change in towns too.
You don't live in Kansas, don't talk s**t. The local CHL team where I live (Wichita) is drawing the most fans in years, despite having a bad season.
I think hockey COULD work in KC, however, as I've told many Pens fans, I wouldn't want the Pens (not because that wouldn't be an awesome team to watch) but rather because the Penguins are PITTSBURGH's team...it wouldn't be right watching them anywhere else.