BigBush*
Guest
Presumably, your third is:
Prince - Pageau - Lazar
So, you are in essense saying that Lazar is significantly better than Michalek and Chiasson, or in one case he and Prince are significantly better than them.
So far, Lazar really hasn't proven to be better than Michalek (certainly has the potential to be, but not yet imo), and while I agree he's been better than Chiasson, I thought Chiasson looked every bit his equal on a line with Pageau the other night.
Heck, we could even do this:
Prince - Smith - Michalek and keep Chiasson- Pageau - Lazar together as they looked dynamite as a unit against a strong Nashville team.
I just think if you put Puempel-Smith-Chiasson together, you end up with 3 guys who simply aren't complimentary to one another. It might work as a crash and bang line, but don't expect them to enter the zone with control, or drive possession too often. They also don't make for a particularly enticing defensive unit imo.
I like Pageau and Lazar as the make up of our 3rd line. they can be trusted to log tough minutes against good competition because they are good defensively and dont get hemmed in their own zone too often. I'd be open to Michalek or Prince on their wing.
The best our 4th line looked last year was Puempel-Legwand-Chiasson. I'd like to give that another shot (at some point) as i feel Puempel may be a better fit on the 4th line with these guys then Prince
I'd be open to the bolded suggestion,but I dont have a lot of faith in Chiasson. I think that line looked dynamite more so because of Pageau and Lazar, and it helped that Chiasson had one of his odd few games. I'd rather see Michalek get more ice time then Chiasson, every night.