Also is it just me, or is extending a coach's contract mid season not mind numbingly stupid?
Not always... In his case it was.
Last edited by a moderator:
Also is it just me, or is extending a coach's contract mid season not mind numbingly stupid?
Meh, been less than a week since elimination, it's always this bad when the wounds are still fresh.
Expansion draft and amateur draft will be here soon, the action should be fun around here again soon....
It was this bad during the season too.
Irish, out of curiosity, what is your argument for keeping him?
Didn't see this earlier. My bad.
I, for one, think his system/style of play is fine. It has it's faults, which are exacerbated by poor blueline personnel and some stubbornness on his part.
But that's probably not going to happen in his tenure here. Think that kind of overhaul is completed after he's already gone.
I don't think he's the best coach in the league, nor do I think he's the worst.
Now, let's commence everyone telling me why I'm wrong and why he's been carried through his career by goaltending and lucky to be an NHL coach.
At this point is it safe to say he's the head coach going into training camp?
I don't think your analysis is wrong, but it's unfortunate that you downplay a legitimate argument in your last sentence.
AV is an average coach who has been carried by great goaltending his entire career which makes people believe he's a better coach than he is.
Kind of like how before their contracts, Staal and Girardi were average d-men who we paid like top d-men because we were fooled into believing they were great d-men because of the goalie they played in front of.
At this point is it safe to say he's the head coach going into training camp?
So I know we all give AV a ton of **** for third period turtles in the playoffs..... but this is an interesting case of the eye-test and the metrics perhaps not aligning.
The Rangers have a 3rd period shot attempt % of 39.6%. Again, let me be clear. This is all situations only when leading in the third period of a playoff game. Not tied. Not trailing. Only leading. That 39.6% is 10th among teams who have led in the third period of a hockey game since the 2014 playoffs. I should also mention that number does not include this year's playoffs, which I'm sure AV is benefiting from greatly.
Will have more on this in the advanced stats thread either tonight or sometime this week.
Interesting, though.
So I know we all give AV a ton of **** for third period turtles in the playoffs..... but this is an interesting case of the eye-test and the metrics perhaps not aligning.
The Rangers have a 3rd period shot attempt % of 39.6%. Again, let me be clear. This is all situations only when leading in the third period of a playoff game. Not tied. Not trailing. Only leading. That 39.6% is 10th among teams who have led in the third period of a hockey game since the 2014 playoffs. I should also mention that number does not include this year's playoffs, which I'm sure AV is benefiting from greatly.
39.6% is +0.4% relative to the rest of the league.
Will have more on this in the advanced stats thread either tonight or sometime this week.
Interesting, though.
Hopefully this is something we can work on in terms of strategy. We do this so often. It causes our breakouts to seem disjointed. Addressing the defense could fix this, but our coaches need to emphasize moving it out quickly.
I don't disagree but that video isn't a great example.
Subban's waiting on a line change there.
Just stop sending both dmen below the goal line to pressure the puck. It's peewee level hockey reads and it puts such an onus on the forwards to always pick up lapses. Keep the defense simple and keep the offense the same. Actually trying to defend the neutral zone would be a bonus too.
Really didn't need to give him an extension earlier this season. Could've waited until...oh...af5er the playoffs?
Rangers should've won this series in five. His player usage in the last few minutes of game 2 and 5 were horrific. Likely the Rangers get beaten out by Pittsburgh. I would've rather gone down to a team that is better vs giving it away to a worse opponent.
He's all about outnumbering. But it doesn't work without the skaters on the backend.
Earlier in the year I said watch Theodore & Montour make ANA and contribute.
They are pushing them in the playoffs.
Those are your modern defensemen. The transporters with the smart shot. They can skate it out, transition with slower forwards.
Rangers need to pressure in the neutral zone, and switch between box+1 with rotations instead of the center chasing, and man on man.
The success trend this year is RH shots up-front.
All 3 of 4 final teams can ice 3 RH forwards on a line.
That mixes up the common cycling patterns and opens up different lanes, and forces goalies to play the RH shot more often. (High glove is easier to score on than high blocker.
All the final four teams have multiple defensemen capable of carrying a counter transition.
Rangers lack the above.
AV or Staal need to go - we can`t have him in his system.
AV or Staal need to go - we can`t have him in his system.