This is why I think the general Hall - Larsson trade discussion is so weird. It's complex, it's not just about how many points Hall scored and how many points Larsson stopped or produced. First of all, would Edmonton look like a more legit contender with Hall than without Larsson? Nope, the defense would be a garbage fire. So, Hall is very talented offensively, but defensively he's not the one the coach would raise the hand of. Edmonton needs defensive stability and has been in that urgent moment for quite a while now. The situation has improved, but it's nowhere close to legit.
So, Hall could bring a second punch to the offense. Well, good luck having that punch without being molested if your defense is garbage. I will say this about Larsson. He has always been of big figure, knows when and how to hit, how to play positionally and all that, but... I just think it's weird his great passing ability is so underutilized in the NHL. I watched him in the SEL, I could never dream he would ever end up in this situation, flinging pucks out of the zone instead of taking an extra step and release a counterattack.
So Hall thrives in a franchise driven around systematic two-way responsibility. No ****. Larsson playing like Adam Foote however? I can see why that trade was seen as won by NJ, even though Larsson brings alot to the stability of Edmonon not shown in stats.
Larsson's passing is of Swedish national team standard. That should tell you, he knows how to deliver a puck. He is very solid defensively, but can dish the puck. But if he tries to cover for a dumpster fire, I can understand he has to hold the fort and not help win the game.