GDT: 2018 WJC • Game 16 • Group A: DEN (0) - CAN (8) F

Woodhouse

Registered User
Dec 20, 2007
15,525
1,754
New York, NY
Group A:
7.png
Denmark vs.
3.png
Canada

Dec. 30 • 20:00 ET • 02:00 CET
Key Bank Center — Buffalo, NY
TV: NHLN, TSN 1/4/5


7.png
Denmark

(Confirmed lineup per IIHF.)

16 Jonas Rondberg - 19 Nikolaj Krag - 20 Joachim Blichfeld
11 Valdemar Ahlberg - 23 David Madsen - 8 Jacob Schmidt-Svejstrup
21 Daniel Nielsen - 13 Christian Mathiasen-Wejse - 17 Lucas Andersen
28 Christoffer Gath - 27 Phillip Schultz - 25 Magnus Molge
22 Andreas Grundtvig

6 Jakob Jessen - 3 Malte Setkov
4 Christian Larsen - 14 Lasse Mortensen
9 Rasmus Heine - 7 Jeppe Mogensen
2 Oliver Larsen

1 Emil Gransoe
30 Mads Soegaard
31 Kasper Krog


3.png
Canada

(Confirmed lineup per IIHF.)

9 Dillon Dube - 23 Sam Steel - 25 Jordan Kyrou
12 Boris Katchouk - 27 Robert Thomas - 16 Taylor Raddysh
14 Maxim Comtois - 21 Brett Howden - 24 Alex Formenton
11 Jonah Gadjovich - 20 Michael McLeod - 19 Drake Batherson
17 Tyler Steenbergen

28 Victor Mete - 3 Connor Timmins
10 Kale Clague - 8 Dante Fabbro
2 Jake Bean - 6 Cal Foote
7 Cale Makar

31 Carter Hart
1 Colton Point​
 
Last edited:

Statsy

Registered User
Dec 21, 2009
4,665
2,504
Vancouver
Would love to see the coach try some new lines. Not too much faith in Ducharme though.
Despite the loss yesterday, I think things are working pretty well with these lines, actually. Moving people around doesn't magically make things better. The more familiarity players have with one another, the better they should play together. Familiarity just takes some time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: donghabs98

TheGoldenJet

Registered User
Apr 2, 2008
9,419
4,507
Coquitlam, BC
Despite the loss yesterday, I think things are working pretty well with these lines, actually. Moving people around doesn't magically make things better. The more familiarity players have with one another, the better they should play together. Familiarity just takes some time.

He has not tried anything new at all though. And we have not been a dominant team at ES, especially if you consider the blown no-goal call on the first goal of the Finland game.

He should adapt to the circumstances a littl better IMO, and not just remain set in his ways.

Not that it will matter against Denmark.
 

kyle44

Registered User
Jan 7, 2007
909
975
I hope Makar gets promoted today at the expense of some of the banged up guys. His icetime continues to mystify me. I’ve watched every Canadian game, including pre-tournament, and he’s consistently looked like their most dangerous offensive weapon from the back end. Not to mention his clean zone exits (where Clague, Bean, etc. have struggled) and lack of glaring lapses in his own end.
 

BigRangy

Get well soon oliver
Mar 17, 2015
3,407
1,110
I hope Makar gets promoted today at the expense of some of the banged up guys. His icetime continues to mystify me. I’ve watched every Canadian game, including pre-tournament, and he’s consistently looked like their most dangerous offensive weapon from the back end. Not to mention his clean zone exits (where Clague, Bean, etc. have struggled) and lack of glaring lapses in his own end.

It's like Sanheim all over again. Makar is the team's best player and he should be used as such.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Kingslayer

Statsy

Registered User
Dec 21, 2009
4,665
2,504
Vancouver
I'm definitely with you guys on the Makar issue. Hey, let's secretly hatch a plan to bust him out!
 

Statsy

Registered User
Dec 21, 2009
4,665
2,504
Vancouver
Scratched their best goalie, too. I'm gonna make my prediction now.

Canada will win this game! You heard it here first. :sarcasm:
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
18,042
12,664
It's like Sanheim all over again. Makar is the team's best player and he should be used as such.

It does remind me of Sanheim, though not as bad. The main thing I want from this game, from a Canadian perspective, is to see Makar displace someone in the top six at even strength. I am also curious to see how Fabbro skates now that they are back indoors.
 

Mehar

Registered User
Apr 28, 2012
1,303
244
Toronto, Ontario
I do not get the logic of not playing Colton Point in this game. Why is Carter Hart the default starter? Last year in the Gold Medal Game, and even yesterday against the Americans (including the Shootout)- when Canada needed Carter Hart to steal a win for them, he did not get it done. There were goals he let in, that he should not have in both games against the Americans.

Maybe i am being a little harsh or wrong- but i would have given Colton Point a shot yesterday and even today. If Point was outstanding, i would have even given him a look for the QF. Others might disagree, but these are just my thoughts.
 

coolwood

Registered User
Dec 9, 2016
377
104
I do not get the logic of not playing Colton Point in this game. Why is Carter Hart the default starter? Last year in the Gold Medal Game, and even yesterday against the Americans (including the Shootout)- when Canada needed Carter Hart to steal a win for them, he did not get it done. There were goals he let in, that he should not have in both games against the Americans.

Maybe i am being a little harsh or wrong- but i would have given Colton Point a shot yesterday and even today. If Point was outstanding, i would have even given him a look for the QF. Others might disagree, but these are just my thoughts.
I don't think any of the three goals yesterday were Harts fault. I thought he was solid. Also, Ducharme said Hart is starting today because the Quarters aren't until Tuesday so he's trying to keep Hart sharp
 

Statsy

Registered User
Dec 21, 2009
4,665
2,504
Vancouver
I do not get the logic of not playing Colton Point in this game. Why is Carter Hart the default starter? Last year in the Gold Medal Game, and even yesterday against the Americans (including the Shootout)- when Canada needed Carter Hart to steal a win for them, he did not get it done. There were goals he let in, that he should not have in both games against the Americans.

Maybe i am being a little harsh or wrong- but i would have given Colton Point a shot yesterday and even today. If Point was outstanding, i would have even given him a look for the QF. Others might disagree, but these are just my thoughts.
Yep, I disagree. It doesn't really matter though as whomever got the start was barely going to get enough work to make this meaningful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mehar

Mehar

Registered User
Apr 28, 2012
1,303
244
Toronto, Ontario
I don't think any of the three goals yesterday were Harts fault. I thought he was solid. Also, Ducharme said Hart is starting today because the Quarters aren't until Tuesday so he's trying to keep Hart sharp

Why not keep Colton Point sharp as well? Anything can happen in hockey, and it is good to keep both goalies sharp. I am not convinced that Hart is a lot better than Point. In fact, i think Point might be Canada's best option going forward the rest of the way. Hart did not come up big in last year's Gold Medal Game, and did not steal a win yesterday against the Americans as well.
 

Statsy

Registered User
Dec 21, 2009
4,665
2,504
Vancouver
Why not keep Colton Point sharp as well? Anything can happen in hockey, and it is good to keep both goalies sharp. I am not convinced that Hart is a lot better than Point. In fact, i think Point might be Canada's best option going forward the rest of the way. Hart did not come up big in last year's Gold Medal Game, and did not steal a win yesterday against the Americans as well.
He didn't steal a win but he probably stole us the point that will clinch first. We were badly outshot in that game. Maybe we put Point in for the next shootout, though. :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mehar

Snippit

Registered User
Dec 5, 2012
16,585
9,910
So if:

Finland beats USA
Canada beats Denmark
Slovakia beats Denmark
Sweden beats Russia

then it's Sweden vs USA in the 1/4 final
 

coolwood

Registered User
Dec 9, 2016
377
104
Why not keep Colton Point sharp as well? Anything can happen in hockey, and it is good to keep both goalies sharp. I am not convinced that Hart is a lot better than Point. In fact, i think Point might be Canada's best option going forward the rest of the way. Hart did not come up big in last year's Gold Medal Game, and did not steal a win yesterday against the Americans as well.
I simply think Hart hasn't done anything to lose the starting job, and Point hasn't done anything to win the job (although he hasn't had the best chance to)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mehar

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->