Move on from the subject
.
Germany had possession in that semi final. They never were dangerous.
You wish. France's midfield is easily (on paper) the best in the business.
Ozil's lazy, Kroos is good at short lateral passes, Gundogan is injured, rest is not comparable.
Uh, they aren't?
The problem is that evilo is very knowledgeable about French youth talents, so that pomposity is rooted in actual knowledge...it’s just warped by his homerism ;-)
That’s why he gets irritated when I talk about France pulling off an upset against Germany at the euros or how Germany really shouldn’t have screwed up that match even with all of the injuries & suspensions of only Jogi hadn’t screwed up the team selection so embarrassingly.
My arrogance is similarly rooted in my connections to German youth football and the fact that if Jogi were good at his job we would be heading to Russia with the goal of tying the Spanish record for consecutive titles.
I guess we can agree to disagree.Yeah, I get why people are favoring Brazil over Spain as the 3rd favorite team, though that is very debatable and Spain 2018 really is still a mystery in many ways; but Germany & France are on another level right now. Obviously upsets happen, as do unpredictable injuries & suspensions. But calling something like that this far in advance seems odd to me...
Problem is that you think possession is always a good thing.
Our team is better without possession. Our quick forwards will exploit the slow german defensemen, like Mbappe abused Sule time and time again the other day.
Germany had possession in that semi final. They never were dangerous.
Revisionist history.
Well, that means you dont consider that other posters have any knowledge.
Take our Swiss-Denmark discussion - Pretty arrogant to say the least imo. (Dont want to reopen that discussion, just evidence)
I highly doubt Sandro would start over marceloNeymar - Firmino - Jesus
Coutinho - Paulinho
Casemiro
Sandro - Silva - Marquinhos - Alves
Ederson
Arrogance is saying I am wrong about France dominating while anyone and their mother could see it.You blather on with nothing but "...because I said so" and question whether someone saw what they're discussing, and then tell them to "move on". Doesn't matter whether you mean the subject or the forum, you display an arrogance and disrespect that I won't be quiet about either way.
Yes, tell me how.
They dominated that semifinal? Really? When were they dangerous? I remember one single dangerous play.Just barely winning the possession game isn't the be all end all; but germany dominated that semi final, it was Can & Schweini's sloppiness & EM-Müller's wastefulness that kept france in the match. With our quicker thinkers in midfield you wouldn't have even seen the ball, so your quick forwards wouldn't have mattered. Even without Neuer / Boateng / Hummels / Kimmich back there to shut down what few breaks you got.
Midfield play is the most important phase of the modern game, and starving your forwards of the ball is so much easier than doing the same to ours.
Right? It's like he forgets that if we had had Stindl in place of Müller we would've outscored them even with the dumb dumbs in midfield handing them a chances.
Ozil was a key member of our success in the semi final Lazy was a much too gentle word.In literally every single way; every part of that assessment is incorrect. Mesut has never been lazy with the NT, Toni is very incisive, Ilkay is fit right now, and waving away the rest of that talent is simply laughable.
I hope to god France doesn't make it out of their WC group just to be able to quote this post and laugh at it.Arrogance is saying I am wrong about France dominating while anyone and their mother could see it.
How does it have anything to do with future games?I hope to god France doesn't make it out of their WC group just to be able to quote this post and laugh at it.
Wow. I've never seen any post more defensive than this one and I live on the political forum here.How does it have anything to do with future games?
Oh yes, it doesn't. Saying France dominated that friendly isn't anything outrageous and certainly not arrogant.
Saying pompously it's wrong because both teams had close shots fired is actually quite arrogant.
But sure, quote and laugh. I've never made a single prediction saying France would win the WC. On the contrary I might say, I made the prediction they wouldn't.
So yeah, laugh all you want, but try to follow the plot please.
Pretty much the same teams always winning.
And in the finals its always the same 6-7 teams.
Finals Since 1982 contains the same 7 teams, remove Spain and Hollands 1 appearance each and its only 5 teams since 1982.
Winners in bold
1982 :Italy - Germany
1986: Argentina - Germany
1990 :Germany - Argentina
1994: Brazil - Italy
1998: France - Brazil
2002: Brazil - Germany
2006: Italy - France
2010: Spain - Netherlands
2014: Germany - Argentina
Pretty consistent... If you ask me.
Yeah, the top 4 may have 1 or 2 suprises every now and again, but nothing that amounts to anything.
Hence me saying what I did - could be more correct and say top 2. But felt top 4 was accurate since they never get further than that.
Just barely winning the possession game isn't the be all end all; but germany dominated that semi final, it was Can & Schweini's sloppiness & EM-Müller's wastefulness that kept france in the match. With our quicker thinkers in midfield you wouldn't have even seen the ball, so your quick forwards wouldn't have mattered. Even without Neuer / Boateng / Hummels / Kimmich back there to shut down what few breaks you got.
Midfield play is the most important phase of the modern game, and starving your forwards of the ball is so much easier than doing the same to ours.
Right? It's like he forgets that if we had had Stindl in place of Müller we would've outscored them even with the dumb dumbs in midfield handing them a chances.
There's actually quite a few knowledgeable posters on here for a hockey board. You were just being a homer in that discussion, which is why you came away from it thinking I was being overly dismissive.
Plus I'm just always a smartass. It works a lot better in person where my good looks n charm are more effective, but my smartassery applies to everyone, not just people who's opinions I disagree with.
Nice job moving the goalposts since you realized that you were wrong, and choosing a convenient starting point with regards to the finals.
The tournaments in this century alone have had 11 different semi-finalists in 4 tournaments. 4 different winners. Definitely the same teams winning all the time.
It's not consistent. Brazil and Germany are the only two teams that historically make it far on a consistent basis. A group of 6-7 teams being perennial contenders with another 4-5 teams capable of going far is nothing to sneeze at, and they're rarely the same teams. No other team sport has such parity or depth at the international level.
Your initial claim implies that the World Cup is predictable or that few teams have a chance. You're wrong on both counts. The World Cup has plenty of variety.
Yes."France's midfield is easily the best on paper." I think you have this mistaken for the hot take thread. Kante, Pogba, Rabiot, Matuidi, Tolisso, Bakayoko is easily better than Germany's or Spain's? Ok.
No see you just did it again..
You cant just go off and call people homers because you have a different opinion.
I could say the same, you are German, you seem you seem to like the Swiss playing in germany, and follow the BL. Just ad many homer reasons as me being a Canadian Dane.
I even tried to be pretty objective.