Negative. That has been Zach Hyman. Marner has been the best offensive force, though.He has been the best Leaf player in the playoffs.
Negative. That has been Zach Hyman. Marner has been the best offensive force, though.He has been the best Leaf player in the playoffs.
Marner is quickly becoming one of the best players at running a PP, which is something I don't think Debrusk can do. He's playing well, but I don't think he does everything Marner does.DeBrusk has to go lower now with his performance this year and his playoffs too date. Guy has a high motor on both ends of the ice scored yesterday and had 7 hits. Two goals so far and his speed is giving the Leafs problems. He does everything Marner does, just a little less flashy but without any fanfare.
Marner is quickly becoming one of the best players at running a PP, which is something I don't think Debrusk can do. He's playing well, but I don't think he does everything Marner does.
While I do think he has outperformed what people projected of him, there is a case to be made that he should slip a little. You can't really take him over Barzal, Connor, Boeser, and Aho. Then there is Konecny also behind him. Now, he's probably moved ahead of at least Zacha, Strome, and Crouse, but then it gets debatable with a guy like Meier.
This draft looks to be in a position to go down as an all-time great draft class, with very few teams unhappy with their pick (unless they are lamenting passing on Barzal).
@LeafFever really has a knack for being called out and never responding.Ahem, Part 1:
And Part 2:
You were saying?
I have been told here every time I bring him up that he would drop in the selection process. Maybe if people actually watched him, he is finally getting some love from the commentators. Watch what he does all over the ice and his never give up attitude. Bruins fans have been lucky to watch him grow this year. He leads the rookies in scoring so far, 7 pts in 7 games, 22 hits. His 5 goals tie him with Pasta, Ovi, Kucherov and Courturier.Jake Debrusk's legend is growing. Game 7 winner. 2 goals on the night to beat the Leafs. He has impressed me all series. Bruins have a good one here. What a coming out party this series. A player with talent and heart.
I have been told here every time I bring him up that he would drop in the selection process. Maybe if people actually watched him, he is finally getting some love from the commentators. Watch what he does all over the ice and his never give up attitude. Bruins fans have been lucky to watch him grow this year. He leads the rookies in scoring so far, 7 pts in 7 games, 22 hits. His 5 goals tie him with Pasta, Ovi, Kucherov and Courturier.
Provorov at #10? Yikes.
McDavid
Eichel
Werenski
Provorov
Rantanen
Marner
Barzal
Boeser
Hanifin
Aho
Strome
Zacha
Connor
DeBrusk
Konecny
Chabot
Eriksson-Ek
Dunn
Larsson
Carlo
My Top 20, with honorable mentions including Sprong, Beauvillier, Carlsson, Meier, and Samsonov.
How is Meier ahead of Connor5 months later....
Think that list still looks quite accurate honestly. Would have Provorov as the #3 by a wide margin now, and Marner would be further down then #6. Timo Meier gets a huge rise for me as well as I really liked the way his game steadily improved this season.
Think my Top 10 right now would go as follows:
McDavid
Eichel
Provorov
Barzal
Rantanen
Werenski
Boeser
Marner
DeBrusk
Meier
With Connor, Hanifin, Konecny, Dunn, and Aho just outside the Top 10.
And Provorov over Barzal and RantanenHow is Meier ahead of Connor
How is Meier ahead of Connor
And Provorov over Barzal and Rantanen
DeBrusk has to go lower now with his performance this year and his playoffs too date. Guy has a high motor on both ends of the ice scored yesterday and had 7 hits. Two goals so far and his speed is giving the Leafs problems. He does everything Marner does, just a little less flashy but without any fanfare.
So by your logic Matthews moves down a few spots because he had a bad series? I like Marner but there's no way I pick him 3rd, infront of guys like Barzal and Provorov. The others are also debatableMarner had a hell of a first round. 9 points in 7 games. If anything he moves up in any redraft.
Oh I think most have Matthews moving down due to this series. I've seen the responses.So by your logic Matthews moves down a few spots because he had a bad series? I like Marner but there's no way I pick him 3rd, infront of guys like Barzal and Provorov. The others are also debatable
Or it could mean you think the Islanders will play a much less run and gun system and play more defensive, thus taken some opportunities away.If you think Barzal will regress than you are in effect saying he is going to magically lose his incredible ability to hunt down and possess the puck next season. It wasn't an accident that his line was the only one on his entire team that wasn't an advanced stats tire fire.
This is one of the common misconceptions about the Islanders: their defense was bad because they played "run and gun". Their defense was awful because the coach literally implemented a defensive system that basically required his players to play the position completely wrong. Guys were taught NOT to block shooting or passing lanes and allowing clean unobstructed shots on goal was the entire point of the system. Only Doug Weight or people high on bath salts think that is a good strategy.Or it could mean you think the Islanders will play a much less run and gun system and play more defensive, thus taken some opportunities away.
Or it could mean you think the Islanders will play a much less run and gun system and play more defensive, thus taken some opportunities away.
Or maybe Marner will play more than 16:28 per game. Do you know how low that is for 69 points? Barzal got more than 1:30 per game.Yeah, but perhaps Toronto will play a much less and run and gun system and play more defensive, taking some opportunities away from Marner.
Or maybe Marner will play more than 16:28 per game. Do you know how low that is for 69 points? Barzal got more than 1:30 per game.
Barzal would never score that much under Babcock.
I'm sure if Barzal had Babcock as his head coach instead of Doug Weight he'd have scored way more than 85 points. I'd shudder at the amount of offense a coach like Babcock would be able to pull out of a talent like Barzal.
Barzal would have never gotten that ice-time or opportunities trust me.