I don't know where to put this but really interesting read, check it out:
http://www.theplayerstribune.com/miracle-on-ice-hockey-russia/
Yep. That's about the state of things. Larionov probably was a fan of Coach Boudreau's Capitals. Those years were really fun. The handful of times his teams haven't made it far into the playoffs were seen as evidence his approach didn't work. I tend to think it was mostly a matter of almost every team every year not making it very far into the playoffs, and possibly a little about a more defensive approach being more consistent and reliable when it comes down to a single game or a single series against the same team (mainly because you could run into a hot goalie and you will usually run into good team defense in the playoffs, and the farther you get the worse it is).
And I don't think the Trotz-led Capitals are all that boring--and I really thought I would before the season started. Watching your team win is always fun I guess though. I can't tell if it's fun to watch because I'm a fan or if it's just fun to watch period. Certainly not as fun as it was under Boudreau, but it still seems like it's reasonably entertaining for the most part.
But, OK, when you see Backstrom tied for league lead in points, and Ovie leading league in goals--that makes it pretty hard to accuse Trotz of being one of the main culprits in what Larionov's article was talking about.
I think there's something to the idea that when there are fewer teams, each team tends to have more elite-level creative talent, and maybe coaches want to keep things simple for everyone but the crazy talented ones, and nowadays there are a lot of teams in the NHL so there's a lot of players on every team that just do better when they keep it simple. I dunno. I know Russia's team was like a crazy talented all-star team for a lot of the time that Larionov's article was talking about though.