sharkyz15
Registered User
velimiiro said:What a surprise, you're a shark fan, who is saying the sharks made a steal, surprise surprise surprise!
holly crap he just asked if anyone had some info on him
god
why all the drama?
velimiiro said:What a surprise, you're a shark fan, who is saying the sharks made a steal, surprise surprise surprise!
Hero of Tragedy said:Thank you Captain Obvious.
IT DOES?!?Hero of Tragedy said:Back to Remedial Reading with ya...the title says "2004 Steal? Michael Vernace"
Diaboli said:IT DOES?!?
No offense, but that's a stupid thing to say. I meant, that by that headline, the meaning of the headline, is that it asks, "who will be 2004 draft's steal?". I didn't mean, he wrote that specifically, but that his headline implies that Michael Vernace is 2004 draft's steal.
I guess you don't think, that the following titles have any difference.
Bob Goodenow, an illiterate idiot?
Bob Goodenow? An illiterate idiot.
So before you start calling me illiterate, you should practice how to read between the lines. It's not like if someone says a player is a m***** f*****, that this guy really means the player actually does that kind of stuff.
And yes, I did read yours, and sharkies posts before posting this, and the previous post here.
X-SHARKIE said:I was just aking if Michael Vernace is a steal from the 2004 draft, by no means am I calling him THE STEAL!
Good, because we already know who "the steal" was.X-SHARKIE said:I was just aking if Michael Vernace is a steal from the 2004 draft, by no means am I calling him THE STEAL!
On these boards, that are much bereft of punctuation and good grammar, it would probably benefit your blood pressue to overlook the semantics.Diaboli said:I understand. I'm just in the middle of a debate with hero of tragedy , who doesn't seem to understand the basic rules of writing. That's all. This is just about your topic, not your post.
George Bachul said:On these boards, that are much bereft of punctuation and good grammar, it would probably benefit your blood pressue to overlook the semantics.
Leafaholix said:Good, because we already know who "the steal" was.
Earl, Robbie Earl.
lol, and that's a positive thing?X-SHARKIE said:Sharks 7th round pick in 2003 Joe Pavelski has been awesome, he looks like the next Brad Boyes.
Rockstar Life said:At the risk of changing the topic from its 'new' direction, I am a Battalion season ticketholder and have seen him play (that gets my bias out of the way as well).
He's played pretty solid on the power play so far working the puck around well and doing a good job of getting the puck towards the net. Of his five goals, I believe three have been shots from the point and two have been him stepping up on odd man rushes. He's getting better in the defensive zone, or at least more confident taking the man. Not really throwing his weight around much, but certainly by no means a defensive liability.
As I predicted on the Sharks board to little fanfare at the beginning of the season, he's getting a ton of quality minutes with the Battalion and improving with every game. If I've perhaps missed a part of his game anyone would like a comment on, I'd be happy to oblige.
Diaboli said:I guess you don't think, that the following titles have any difference.
So before you start calling me illiterate
NYRBlaznBure9 said:Pff. Obviously you are illiterate, or of some inferior intelligence, because you would know that the comma you've place in the first sentence should not be there. I just love when snobs pick out grammar mistakes, or shorthand, like they’re king of correctness in writing, and you can pull the same on them.
HFNHL Red Wings said:I will give you the benefit of the doubt as you are a seaon ticket holder while I only get to occassional games so maybe you've seen games where he's played better than what I've witnessed.
I am also a Brampton resident and big supporter of the Battalion but of the 4 games I've seen Vernace play I can honestly say he is my 'goat' on the team (Lojek comes a close 2nd).
In the last game against Mississaugga in particular he was absolutely brutal. He scored on the PP in that game and yes his shot strength and accuracy from the point is excellent but everything else is an issue IMO. In that game alone (seen him do this in other games but that was the worst) he twice lost control of the puck when a teammate passed the puck to him on the PP forcing the team to skate out and regroup. I've never seen him even once in the 4 games successfully stop a shot that the opponents were clearing out of their end. Finally he looks completely lost when defending. I see no vision in him whatsover and his skating is average. In short even at the OHL level he should only be used as a PP specialist and even then he has short comings.
That is the here and now. Credit to Stan Butler for sticking with Vernace in normal 5 on 5 situations and honestly if anyone in the OHL can actually make him moderately capable defensively over the next season or two it will be Stan Butler. This is the man that has significantly developed so many Battalion players. I watched him take Brent Burns from defence to fwd in one season and turn him into a 1st round pick (Burns had been mediocre at best in the 1st half of the season). Also saw the results he had on Kamil Kreps who suddenly became a good 2way player by last years playoffs (previously all offence).
In short while I would not project Vernace as a steal as is Butler may yet turn him into that given a season or two.
Although it's too early to tell, the guy everyone should keep an eye on is rookie Battalion dman DeGrey. The offensive stats are not there yet but I see great technical skating, willingness to clear the net (even if the body isn't quite filled out enough to do it effectively), and good vision. He's only playing 3rd pairing most nights b/c he is a rookie but the signs are there and again with at least 2 years to go under the tutelage of Stan Butler I'd say keep an eye on him for 2006.
Diaboli said:IT DOES?!?
No offense, but that's a stupid thing to say. I meant, that by that headline, the meaning of the headline, is that it asks, "who will be 2004 draft's steal?". I didn't mean, he wrote that specifically, but that his headline implies that Michael Vernace is 2004 draft's steal.
I guess you don't think, that the following titles have any difference.
Bob Goodenow, an illiterate idiot?
Bob Goodenow? An illiterate idiot.
So before you start calling me illiterate, you should practice how to read between the lines. It's not like if someone says a player is a m***** f*****, that this guy really means the player actually does that kind of stuff.
And yes, I did read yours, and sharkies posts before posting this, and the previous post here.
Diaboli said:I understand. I'm just in the middle of a debate with hero of tragedy , who doesn't seem to understand the basic rules of writing. That's all. This is just about your topic, not your post.
Diaboli said:IT DOES?!?
No offense, but that's a stupid thing to say. I meant, that by that headline, the meaning of the headline, is that it asks, "who will be 2004 draft's steal?". I didn't mean, he wrote that specifically, but that his headline implies that Michael Vernace is 2004 draft's steal.
I guess you don't think, that the following titles have any difference.
Bob Goodenow, an illiterate idiot?
Bob Goodenow? An illiterate idiot.
So before you start calling me illiterate, you should practice how to read between the lines. It's not like if someone says a player is a m***** f*****, that this guy really means the player actually does that kind of stuff.
And yes, I did read yours, and sharkies posts before posting this, and the previous post here.
AvengerK said:Everyone knows Sharkie's grammar and spelling isn't the greatest. It's improved quite a bit though. No need to bash him for it.
Hero of Tragedy said:Its a matter of people twisting words. But then again one can't argue with an 18 year old know-it-all.
.Hero of tragedy said:All one could read from the title is that Sharkie suggests that he is a steal.
X-SHARKIE said:HAHAHA, Thanks....I'm the first one to admit it to..... I wish hfboards had a thing much like microsoft word were if I mis spelled something ect.....it would have a red line
Would make it sooooo much easier.