This is what everyone is saying though. People are bringing up 9 games as the cutoff to make a final decision, not as a 9 game reward. I really think a couple of you are misunderstanding what we're saying here.
Bratt so far has earned a spot on this NHL roster based on his performance. He has looked NHL ready. When a player comes into camp and plays this well you put him on the roster because he has earned it, otherwise it sends a terrible message to everyone in the organization, that the team doesn't reward good performance. You have up to 9 NHL games to evaluate him in the real season to determine whether he truly is capable of playing here, or if this was just a flash in the pan. There is zero downside to him playing in actual NHL games, and it will be a good experience for him. If he doesn't work out, you send him to junior as you originally planned anyways. If he does work out, we just added an unexpected depth player to this roster who is 19 and will only get better.