The Canes have
Alex Nedeljkovic who put up identical numbers to Demko this season. Demko is untouchable along with Pettersson, Boeser and likely Bo. (I would argue Dahlen & Juolevi are too). Markstrom is worth a ton to Vancouver. He is our only legitimate starter with NHL experience. The knock of Hannifin I seem to be hearing from hockey insiders on Vancouver media. Is that Hanifin is not likely to get much better offensively. They believe he essentially is what he will become because he lacks the offensive instincts. They even referred to his draft year where it was believed Werenski had the higher offensive ceiling which seems to be heading that way. So if all this is true. What is Hanifin maybe a 35-40 point at his peak? I think its very difficult to judge a player at 21 but if those offensive instincts are lacking then he's just a very good puck moving D which is valuable in its own right. It sounds like Carolina doesn't want to pay him top dollar when they already have a good D core. They would get max value on a return on him and it would free up money elsewhere on the lineup. They already got a few of their key d pieces signed for term.
I am guessing it would start with the 7th overall and include a LHD D (Pouliot/Hutton) and a middle 6 forward like Baerstchi. If Carolina doesn't want some of these parts they can then deal them in separate transactions and get pieces they prefer back. Markstrom isn't a terrible goalie he is average but he needs defense in front of him if he wants to become a stable force in net. There is zero chance Nilsson Demko lead this team on to the ice. I suspect Markstrom stays until Demko is ready to try full-time duties.
Disclaimer: I’ve watched damn near every game Hanifin has ever played in the NHL and some might say that I’m not a huge fan of him
Vancouver’s media (and many on this thread) is 1000% wrong. It’s pretty clear all these guys never actually watch Hanifin. I’d say right now he is a solid #4 offensive defender with obvious upside given that he is a 6’3”, 205 lbs 21 year old with 200+ NHL games under his belt.
If Hanifin has one aspect of his game that looks like it is #1D quality then it is his offensive zone play. During the first half of this season Hanifin was top among the league in possession and scoring metrics. He moves well laterally from the point, has great instincts (when confident), gets shots through, and can make beautiful plays.
It is in the defensive zone that Hanifin has issues. And watching Columbus closely these Playoffs, Werenski was struggling with the same issues. Loses his man too often, gets overpowered, gets flustered and makes a bad outlet pass... things that veterans do to abuse young players work well on Hanifin. He has slowly gotten better as his minutes have increased and the hope is that experience will mold him to a more acceptable range. I don’t think he will ever be great in the defensive zone - at best he will refine his positoning, get stronger, and try to keep it as simple as possible. He has the size and skating to be effective enough.
Earlier comparisons as Hanifin’s upside as a “#2 like Hampus Lindholm” are egregiously bad. That is the polar opposite of his likely upside IMO.